Research Radartracking 1,762 published studies · 471 human · 11 safety signals · 58 clinical trials · 44 cancer pages · updated Sep 2026Open the Research Map →

Research Radar

New PubMed studies on repurposed drugs and natural compounds in cancer — summarized in plain language. A person reviews each one; registered human trials and meta-analyses that pass every automated check post without waiting for that review.

How to read this page. These studies are automatically collected from PubMed and summarized by AI from the abstract. A person reviews them; the strongest tier — registered human trials and meta-analyses that pass every automated check — is posted first and reviewed after. Each summary describes only what that study reported — most are early lab, animal, or small human studies, and findings often conflict. This is educational information, not medical advice, and not a recommendation to take anything. Always talk with your oncologist.
Topic tags. Each study is filed under its main topic. Anticancer studies are the default; these tags flag the other dimensions:
Safety — Safety & interactionsAbsorption (PK) — How it's absorbed (PK)Formulation — Formulation & deliverySupportive care — Symptom & supportive careMetabolism — Metabolism & pathwaysTrial — Clinical trialMechanism — Biomarker & mechanism
Showing studies that mention “colon cancer”.
1 of 200 studies
Meta-analysisReported positiveStrong evidenceTier 4 · clinicaln = 60

Association between red and processed meat consumption and colorectal cancer risk: a comprehensive meta-analysis of prospective studies

GeroScience · Jun 2025 · meta-analysis of prospective studies

colorectal cancercolon cancerrectal cancer

This meta-analysis pooled 60 prospective studies to evaluate associations between red, processed, and total meat consumption and colorectal, colon, and rectal cancer risk. Higher intake of red, processed, and total meat was each associated with modestly increased hazard ratios for colorectal, colon, and rectal cancer in the pooled analyses.

Reported effects: Red meat - colon cancer HR 1.22 [1.15–1.3] · Red meat - colorectal cancer HR 1.15 [1.1–1.21] · +7 more

Key findings
  • Red meat consumption was associated with increased risk of colon cancer (HR = 1.22, 95% CI 1.15-1.30), colorectal cancer (HR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.10-1.21), and rectal cancer (HR = 1.22, 95% CI 1.07-1.39).
  • Processed meat consumption was associated with increased risk of colon cancer (HR = 1.13, 95% CI 1.07-1.20), colorectal cancer (HR = 1.21, 95% CI 1.14-1.28), and rectal cancer (HR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.05-1.30).
  • Total meat consumption was associated with increased risk of colon cancer (HR = 1.22, 95% CI 1.11-1.35), colorectal cancer (HR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.12-1.22), and rectal cancer (HR = 1.28, 95% CI 1.10-1.48).
Limitations: Observational prospective studies cannot establish causation; associations may reflect residual confounding.; Potential heterogeneity across included studies (populations, exposure assessment, covariate adjustment) may affect pooled estimates.; Dietary measurement error and misclassification in the original studies may bias results.; Abstract does not report dose-response specifics or uniform exposure definitions across studies..

AI summary of the abstract, published automatically under the strong-evidence tier · Jul 2026; an editor has not yet reviewed it. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed · Full text