Research Radartracking 1,138 published studies · 277 human · 6 safety signals · 42 clinical trials · 44 cancer pages · updated Jul 2026Open the Research Map →

Mirvetuximab Soravtansine

← All agents

Human-reviewed · How we review →

AI extractedhuman reviewedsources checkedretractions suppressed

Evidence at a glanceHuman · observationalMixed results⚠ Studies disagree
3 published studies tagged to this agent2 human studies approved & graded (trial, observational, or meta-analysis)
Why this grade?

Human · observationalHuman observational evidence only — no trials.

Computed deterministically from the studies’ types and reported outcomes — not written by AI, and not a claim that anything works.

Auto-discovered · not yet curatedmirvetuximab soravtansine
Educational only, not medical advice. OncoForge makes no claim that Mirvetuximab Soravtansine treats, prevents, or cures any condition, beyond what the linked studies show. Evidence levels vary; effects may not translate to people, and some compounds can cause harm. Always coordinate with your oncology team.

Simple Summary

Auto-discovered from 1 recent study; not yet curated.

Research

Where the evidence is

What has been studied, and how strong it is, by topic. A dashed cell means no studies were found for that combination — a gap, not evidence of no effect. Open a row to see its studies.

CancerHuman evidenceMechanismSafetyTrial
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer111
Fallopian Tube Cancer11
Fallopian Tube Neoplasms11
Ovarian Cancer11
Primary Peritoneal Cancer11
Primary Peritoneal Neoplasms11
High Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma1
Ovarian Neoplasms1
Platinum Resistant Epithelial Ovarian Cancer1

Reported figures

Study mix

3 published studies by what they were done in. Lab and animal findings often do not carry over to people.

2 Human1 Review/other
Reported directionReported positive1Mixed results1Reported negative1

What supports this page

The kinds of sources behind this page, strongest at the top. Faint rungs show what is not here yet.

Guideline
0
Meta-analysis
0
Systematic review
0
Randomized trial
0
Clinical trial
0
Observational
2
Case report
0
Review
1
Preclinical
0
Other
0
3 studies2 human1 review/other

Tracking 3 published studies of Mirvetuximab Soravtansine: 2 in humans, 1 reviews/other.

Reported direction across studies: 1 positive, 1 mixed, 1 negative.

Findings conflict — both supportive and negative/mixed results exist (see below). Human evidence is limited.

These counts summarize what the studies reported; they are not a measure of whether Mirvetuximab Soravtansine works.

Cancers named in these studies

epithelial ovarian cancer (2)high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (1)platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer (1)ovarian neoplasms (1)ovarian cancer (1)fallopian tube neoplasms (1)primary peritoneal neoplasms (1)primary peritoneal cancer (1)fallopian tube cancer (1)

Conflicting evidence

All studies

ReviewMechanismReported positiveModerate evidenceTier 4 · clinical

Folate Receptor Alpha in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Diagnostic Role and Therapeutic Implications of a Clinically Validated Biomarker

International journal of molecular sciences · May 2025 · review

Mirvetuximab-soravtansineepithelial ovarian cancerhigh-grade serous ovarian carcinomaplatinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancerovarian neoplasms

This review summarizes the role of folate receptor alpha (FRα) in ovarian cancer, noting that FRα is frequently overexpressed in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. It describes that a VENTANA IHC assay is approved as a companion diagnostic to select patients (≥75% tumor cells with moderate to strong membrane staining) for the FRα-targeted antibody-drug conjugate mirvetuximab soravtansine, and discusses biological significance, IHC technical issues, and heterogeneity of expression across subtypes and tissue samples.

Key findings
  • FRα is frequently overexpressed in several epithelial malignancies, particularly in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma.
  • The VENTANA FOLR1 (FOLR1-2.1) RxDx Assay (IHC) is now approved as a companion diagnostic for selecting patients eligible for mirvetuximab soravtansine.
  • Clinical trials (SORAYA and MIRASOL) demonstrated significant clinical benefit in platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer patients with high FRα expression (≥75% of tumor cells with moderate to strong membrane staining).
  • The review summarizes biological significance of FRα in ovarian cancer progression and its predictive value for targeted therapy.
  • Technical aspects of IHC assessment, including scoring interpretation and pre-analytical variables, are discussed.
  • Heterogeneity in FRα expression across histological subtypes and tumor sites, and differences between archival versus fresh tissue, are important considerations.
Limitations: This is a review article and does not present new, individual patient-level data.; FRα expression heterogeneity across histologic subtypes and tumor sites may limit generalizability of biomarker-based selection.; IHC technical factors and pre-analytical variables can affect assessment of FRα and thus patient selection.; The companion diagnostic and demonstrated benefit apply specifically to patients with high FRα expression (≥75%), so findings may not extend to lower expressors..

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed · Jul 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed · Full text

Human · observationalMechanismMixed resultsLimited evidenceTier 3 · early humann = 425

Analysis of real world FRα testing in ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancers

Gynecologic oncology · Jan 2025 · retrospective study

Mirvetuximab-soravtansineovarian cancerfallopian tube neoplasmsprimary peritoneal neoplasms

This retrospective study looked at 425 tumor samples from people with ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancers to see how often folate receptor alpha (FRα) was present. FRα was found in 36.3% of cases and was more common in high-grade serous ovarian tumors and in samples from the ovary, fallopian tube, adnexa, or dominant pelvic masses than in metastatic sites. The study also found that some patients had different FRα results in different specimens, suggesting variability in testing results across samples.

Reported effect: positive rates 44.4%, p=0.02

Key findings
  • FRα was highly expressed in 36.3% of cases.
  • FRα positivity was significantly associated with high-grade serous ovarian histology.
  • Samples from the ovary, fallopian tube, adnexa, and dominant pelvic masses had higher FRα positivity than metastatic sites (44.4% vs 32.5%, p = 0.02).
  • Time between collection and testing did not impact FRα expression.
  • Among 8 patients with more than one specimen tested, 3 (37.5%) had discordant results.
Limitations: Retrospective single-study biomarker analysis.; No treatment outcomes or patient survival endpoints were reported.; Biomarker testing only; does not test mirvetuximab soravtansine efficacy.; Potential sampling and site-related heterogeneity.; Small subgroup with repeated specimens (n=8)..

Useful for understanding FRα testing patterns relevant to selecting patients for FRα-targeted therapy, but it does not evaluate anticancer efficacy.

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed · Jun 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed

Human · observationalSafetyReported negativeLimited evidenceTier 3 · early humann = 5

Ocular Toxicity of Mirvetuximab

Cornea · Feb 2019 · case series

Supportive careMirvetuximab-soravtansineepithelial ovarian cancerprimary peritoneal cancerfallopian tube cancer

This case series describes five women receiving mirvetuximab soravtansine who developed bilateral corneal subepithelial opacities and symptoms such as blurred vision and tearing. Imaging (AS-IR and AS-OCT) showed hyporeflective, likely cystic, subepithelial lesions. With a short course of topical steroids and lubricants, all patients' corneas cleared and visual acuity fully recovered.

Reported effects: average age 62.4, n=5 · blurred vision (n) 5, n=5 · +5 more

Key findings
  • All 5 patients were female (average age, 62.4 ± 5.5 years) and being treated for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer, primary peritoneal cancer, or fallopian tube cancer.
  • Both eyes were involved in each case.
  • Patients complained of blurred vision (n = 5), ocular pain (n = 2), tearing (n = 5), foreign-body sensation (n = 4), and photophobia (n = 4).
  • Slit-lamp examination demonstrated fine corneal subepithelial opacities, mainly involving the corneal periphery migrating toward the center.
  • AS-IR revealed the presence of hyporeflective dots on the cornea, suggesting that they were cystic.
  • AS-OCT confirmed the subepithelial location of lesions.
  • In all patients, the cornea cleared, and visual acuity recovered fully with a short course of topical steroids and lubricants.
Limitations: Very small sample size (n = 5) from a single center (case series).; No control or comparator group.; No detailed information on mirvetuximab soravtansine dose, schedule, or timing of symptom onset relative to dosing.; No long-term follow-up reported to assess recurrence or late sequelae.; No mechanistic or histologic confirmation of the lesions beyond imaging..

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed · Jul 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed

What changed recently

The latest additions to Mirvetuximab Soravtansine's evidence base, and anything that's been retracted.

Recently added

Cancers where Mirvetuximab Soravtansine reported positive results

Where at least one study reported a positive result, shown with the full picture, not just the wins. Positive results are more likely to be published, and most of these are early lab or animal studies that may not translate to people. This reports what studies found, not what works.

Preclinical only: lab / animal (4)
Epithelial ovarian cancer1 positive1 negative/mixed1 human
Limitations: This is a review article and does not present new, individual patient-level data.; FRα expression heterogeneity across histologic subtypes and tumor sites may limit generalizability of biomarker-based selection.; IHC technical factors and pre-analytical variables can affect assessment of FRα and thus patient selection.; The companion diagnostic and demonstrated benefit apply specifically to patients with high FRα expression (≥75%), so findings may not extend to lower expressors..
Cited positive studies (1)
Limitations: This is a review article and does not present new, individual patient-level data.; FRα expression heterogeneity across histologic subtypes and tumor sites may limit generalizability of biomarker-based selection.; IHC technical factors and pre-analytical variables can affect assessment of FRα and thus patient selection.; The companion diagnostic and demonstrated benefit apply specifically to patients with high FRα expression (≥75%), so findings may not extend to lower expressors..
Cited positive studies (1)
Limitations: This is a review article and does not present new, individual patient-level data.; FRα expression heterogeneity across histologic subtypes and tumor sites may limit generalizability of biomarker-based selection.; IHC technical factors and pre-analytical variables can affect assessment of FRα and thus patient selection.; The companion diagnostic and demonstrated benefit apply specifically to patients with high FRα expression (≥75%), so findings may not extend to lower expressors..
Cited positive studies (1)
Ovarian neoplasms1 positive
Limitations: This is a review article and does not present new, individual patient-level data.; FRα expression heterogeneity across histologic subtypes and tumor sites may limit generalizability of biomarker-based selection.; IHC technical factors and pre-analytical variables can affect assessment of FRα and thus patient selection.; The companion diagnostic and demonstrated benefit apply specifically to patients with high FRα expression (≥75%), so findings may not extend to lower expressors..
Cited positive studies (1)

Evidence at a glance: Mirvetuximab Soravtansine by cancer

A deterministic grade of what published studies report for each: strength of evidence, the reported direction, and the largest credible effect, strongest-evidence first. This summarizes findings; it is not a claim that anything works.

Epithelial ovarian cancerHuman · observationalMixed results1 human

Human observational evidence only — no trials.

Largest credible effect: average age 62.4, n=5 PMID 30379722 · effect sizes 2–62.4 across 7 studies

Most authoritative study: Ocular Toxicity of Mirvetuximab

Findings conflict across studies · Effect sizes reported in only 1 of 2 studies.
Fallopian tube cancerHuman · observationalReported negative1 human

Human observational evidence only — no trials.

Largest credible effect: average age 62.4, n=5 PMID 30379722 · effect sizes 2–62.4 across 7 studies

Most authoritative study: Ocular Toxicity of Mirvetuximab

Based on a single study.
Fallopian tube neoplasmsHuman · observationalMixed results1 human

Human observational evidence only — no trials.

Largest credible effect: positive rates 44.4%, p=0.02 PMID 39631181

Most authoritative study: Analysis of real world FRα testing in ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancers

Based on a single study.
Ovarian cancerHuman · observationalMixed results1 human

Human observational evidence only — no trials.

Largest credible effect: positive rates 44.4%, p=0.02 PMID 39631181

Most authoritative study: Analysis of real world FRα testing in ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancers

Based on a single study.
Primary peritoneal cancerHuman · observationalReported negative1 human

Human observational evidence only — no trials.

Largest credible effect: average age 62.4, n=5 PMID 30379722 · effect sizes 2–62.4 across 7 studies

Most authoritative study: Ocular Toxicity of Mirvetuximab

Based on a single study.
Primary peritoneal neoplasmsHuman · observationalMixed results1 human

Human observational evidence only — no trials.

Largest credible effect: positive rates 44.4%, p=0.02 PMID 39631181

Most authoritative study: Analysis of real world FRα testing in ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancers

Based on a single study.
High-grade serous ovarian carcinomaInsufficient evidenceReported positive

No primary experimental studies yet.

Most authoritative study: Folate Receptor Alpha in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Diagnostic Role and Therapeutic Implications of a Clinically Validated Biomarker

No human studies yet · No numeric effect sizes reported · Based on a single study.
Ovarian neoplasmsInsufficient evidenceReported positive

No primary experimental studies yet.

Most authoritative study: Folate Receptor Alpha in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Diagnostic Role and Therapeutic Implications of a Clinically Validated Biomarker

No human studies yet · No numeric effect sizes reported · Based on a single study.
Platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancerInsufficient evidenceReported positive

No primary experimental studies yet.

Most authoritative study: Folate Receptor Alpha in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Diagnostic Role and Therapeutic Implications of a Clinically Validated Biomarker

No human studies yet · No numeric effect sizes reported · Based on a single study.

Clinical trials studying Mirvetuximab Soravtansine

0 ongoing · 2 completed · tracked from ClinicalTrials.gov. Recruiting is not the same as proven, and completed is not the same as positive — read the results. Not a recommendation.

Completed
1 stopped (terminated / withdrawn / suspended)

Search all trials on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Inclusion here is not an endorsement. OncoForge makes no claim beyond what the linked studies show. Discuss anything on this page with your oncology team before acting on it.

← All agents · Research Radar