Research Radartracking 1,316 published studies Β· 343 human Β· 8 safety signals Β· 43 clinical trials Β· 44 cancer pages Β· updated Aug 2026Open the Research Map β†’

Actinomycin D

← All agents

Human-reviewed Β· How we review β†’

AI extractedhuman reviewedsources checkedretractions suppressed

Evidence at a glanceInsufficient evidenceReported positive
2 published studies tagged to this agent0 human studies approved & graded (trial, observational, or meta-analysis)
Why this grade?

Insufficient evidence β€” No primary experimental studies yet.

Computed deterministically from the studies’ types and reported outcomes β€” not written by AI, and not a claim that anything works.

Auto-discovered Β· not yet curatedactinomycin d
Educational only, not medical advice. OncoForge makes no claim that Actinomycin D treats, prevents, or cures any condition, beyond what the linked studies show. Evidence levels vary; effects may not translate to people, and some compounds can cause harm. Always coordinate with your oncology team.

Simple Summary

Auto-discovered from 1 recent study; not yet curated.

Research

Where the evidence is

What has been studied, and how strong it is, by topic. A dashed cell means no studies were found for that combination β€” a gap, not evidence of no effect. Open a row to see its studies.

CancerHuman evidenceMechanismSafetyTrial
Lung Neoplasmβ€”β€”β€”β€”
Ovarian Rhabdomyosarcomaβ€”1β€”β€”
Pleural Neoplasmβ€”β€”β€”β€”
Pleuropulmonary Blastomaβ€”β€”β€”β€”
Pulmonary Blastomaβ€”β€”β€”β€”

Reported figures

What supports this page

The kinds of sources behind this page, strongest at the top. Faint rungs show what is not here yet.

Guideline
0
Meta-analysis
0
Systematic review
0
Randomized trial
0
Clinical trial
0
Observational
0
Case report
2
Review
0
Preclinical
0
Other
0
2 studies2 review/other

Tracking 2 published studies of Actinomycin D: 2 reviews/other.

Reported direction across studies: 1 positive, 1 inconclusive.

No human studies yet β€” these are preclinical (lab/animal) findings that may not translate to people.

These counts summarize what the studies reported; they are not a measure of whether Actinomycin D works.

Cancers named in these studies

ovarian rhabdomyosarcoma (1)pleuropulmonary blastoma (1)pulmonary blastoma (1)lung neoplasm (1)pleural neoplasm (1)

All studies

Case reportInconclusiveLimited evidenceTier 3 Β· early humann = 1

Primary ovarian rhabdomyosarcoma: A diagnostic dilemma in an uncommon tumor

Journal of cancer research and therapeutics Β· Oct 2025 Β· case report

CyclophosphamideActinomycin-dVincristineovarian rhabdomyosarcoma

This case report describes a 17-year-old girl with a very rare ovarian rhabdomyosarcoma. The tumor was diagnosed by imaging, pathology, and immunohistochemistry, and it came back within 3 months after surgery. The authors report that she then received VAC chemotherapy (vincristine, actinomycin D, and cyclophosphamide), and they emphasize the need for earlier diagnosis and more standardized treatment approaches.

Studied with: vincristine, actinomycin D, cyclophosphamide.

Key findings
  • Imaging showed a large solid-cystic pelvic mass.
  • Histopathology and immunohistochemical markers (desmin, myogenin, WT1) confirmed ovarian rhabdomyosarcoma.
  • Recurrence occurred within 3 months after surgical resection.
  • VAC chemotherapy was given after early relapse.
Limitations: Single-patient case report.; No control group.; No quantitative treatment outcome data reported.; Cannot determine effectiveness of VAC from this report alone.; Focus is diagnostic and descriptive rather than evaluative..

Describes a rare ovarian cancer case and subsequent chemotherapy, but does not evaluate a compound's anticancer effect in a comparative way.

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed Β· Jun 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed

Case reportReported positiveLimited evidenceTier 3 Β· early humann = 1

Pleuropulmonary blastoma

European journal of pediatric surgery : official journal of Austrian Association of Pediatric Surgery ... [et al] = Zeitschrift fur Kinderchirurgie Β· Aug 2001 Β· Case report

IfosfamideVincristineActinomycin-dpleuropulmonary blastomapulmonary blastomalung neoplasmpleural neoplasm

This is a single-case report of a 3-year-old boy with pleuropulmonary blastoma who underwent radical resection (bilobectomy) followed by monthly cycles of ifosfamide, vincristine and actinomycin D for 10 months. Histology showed blastemal and mesenchymal areas with rhabdomyoblastic and liposarcomatous differentiation. The patient was alive and disease-free two years after diagnosis; the authors state the favorable outcome is probably due to the radical resection.

Reported effects: chemotherapy duration 10 months 10 mo, n=1 Β· disease-free follow-up 2 years 2, n=1

Studied with: ifosfamide + vincristine + actinomycin D, surgical resection (bilobectomy).

Key findings
  • Radical resection of the mass was achieved by bilobectomy.
  • Histology showed blastemal and mesenchymal areas with focal rhabdomyoblastic and liposarcomatous differentiation.
  • Monthly cycles of chemotherapy with ifosfamide, vincristine and actinomycin D were given for 10 months after surgery.
  • The patient was alive and disease-free two years after diagnosis.
  • Authors suggest complete tumour ablation is essential to prevent local recurrence and that the favourable outcome is probably due to radical resection.
Limitations: Single-patient case report (n=1) limits generalizability.; No control or comparison group, so causality between interventions and outcome cannot be established.; No specific chemotherapy dose amounts provided in the abstract.; Short-to-moderate follow-up (two years) for long-term outcomes is limited..

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed Β· Jul 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed

What changed recently

The latest additions to Actinomycin D's evidence base, and anything that's been retracted.

Recently added

Cancers where Actinomycin D reported positive results

Where at least one study reported a positive result, shown with the full picture, not just the wins. Positive results are more likely to be published, and most of these are early lab or animal studies that may not translate to people. This reports what studies found, not what works.

Preclinical only: lab / animal (4)
Limitations: Single-patient case report (n=1) limits generalizability.; No control or comparison group, so causality between interventions and outcome cannot be established.; No specific chemotherapy dose amounts provided in the abstract.; Short-to-moderate follow-up (two years) for long-term outcomes is limited..
Cited positive studies (1)
Pulmonary blastoma1 positive
Limitations: Single-patient case report (n=1) limits generalizability.; No control or comparison group, so causality between interventions and outcome cannot be established.; No specific chemotherapy dose amounts provided in the abstract.; Short-to-moderate follow-up (two years) for long-term outcomes is limited..
Cited positive studies (1)
Lung neoplasm1 positive
Limitations: Single-patient case report (n=1) limits generalizability.; No control or comparison group, so causality between interventions and outcome cannot be established.; No specific chemotherapy dose amounts provided in the abstract.; Short-to-moderate follow-up (two years) for long-term outcomes is limited..
Cited positive studies (1)
Pleural neoplasm1 positive
Limitations: Single-patient case report (n=1) limits generalizability.; No control or comparison group, so causality between interventions and outcome cannot be established.; No specific chemotherapy dose amounts provided in the abstract.; Short-to-moderate follow-up (two years) for long-term outcomes is limited..
Cited positive studies (1)

Evidence at a glance: Actinomycin D by cancer

A deterministic grade of what published studies report for each: strength of evidence, the reported direction, and the largest credible effect, strongest-evidence first. This summarizes findings; it is not a claim that anything works.

Lung neoplasmInsufficient evidenceReported positive

No primary experimental studies yet.

Largest credible effect: chemotherapy duration 10 months 10 mo, n=1 PMID 11558020 Β· effect sizes 2–10 across 2 studies

Most authoritative study: Pleuropulmonary blastoma

No human studies yet Β· Based on a single study.
Ovarian rhabdomyosarcomaInsufficient evidenceInconclusive

No primary experimental studies yet.

Most authoritative study: Primary ovarian rhabdomyosarcoma: A diagnostic dilemma in an uncommon tumor

No human studies yet Β· No numeric effect sizes reported Β· Based on a single study.
Pleural neoplasmInsufficient evidenceReported positive

No primary experimental studies yet.

Largest credible effect: chemotherapy duration 10 months 10 mo, n=1 PMID 11558020 Β· effect sizes 2–10 across 2 studies

Most authoritative study: Pleuropulmonary blastoma

No human studies yet Β· Based on a single study.
Pleuropulmonary blastomaInsufficient evidenceReported positive

No primary experimental studies yet.

Largest credible effect: chemotherapy duration 10 months 10 mo, n=1 PMID 11558020 Β· effect sizes 2–10 across 2 studies

Most authoritative study: Pleuropulmonary blastoma

No human studies yet Β· Based on a single study.
Pulmonary blastomaInsufficient evidenceReported positive

No primary experimental studies yet.

Largest credible effect: chemotherapy duration 10 months 10 mo, n=1 PMID 11558020 Β· effect sizes 2–10 across 2 studies

Most authoritative study: Pleuropulmonary blastoma

No human studies yet Β· Based on a single study.

Dose: as studied, not a recommendation

These are doses as studied or reported, never a recommendation. The right amount of Actinomycin D depends on you, your other medicines, and your situation; decide it with your oncology team and pharmacist, not from a web page.
Doses reported in studies
  • Pleuropulmonary blastoma monthly cycles for 10 months; specific dose amounts not specified Β· Case report Β· Aug 2001

Clinical trials studying Actinomycin D

1 ongoing Β· 0 completed Β· tracked from ClinicalTrials.gov. Recruiting is not the same as proven, and completed is not the same as positive β€” read the results. Not a recommendation.

Search all trials on ClinicalTrials.gov β†’

Inclusion here is not an endorsement. OncoForge makes no claim beyond what the linked studies show. Discuss anything on this page with your oncology team before acting on it.

← All agents Β· Research Radar