These are reviewed studies whose abstracts concern Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma. Each describes only what that study reported. This is not a claim by OncoForge that any compound helps or harms Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma. Most are early lab, animal, or small human studies, and findings often conflict.
Human · observationalMechanismReported positiveLimited evidenceTier 3 · early humann = 216
International journal of molecular sciences · Mar 2026 · retrospective cohort
pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinomaLCNEC
Researchers performed targeted next-generation sequencing on 216 pulmonary LCNEC tumor samples from a retrospective Polish cohort to look for actionable gene variants. They found 46 variants in 46/216 samples (21.3%), with 28/216 (13%) harboring at least one potentially actionable alteration; most common were KRAS and PIK3CA (each 5%), and a novel TMEM79::NTRK1 fusion was found in one case (0.5%). Several typical NSCLC alterations (classical EGFR exon 18–21, ALK, FGFR1/2/3, ROS1) were not detected.
Reported effects: variant_count 46, n=216 · variant_positive_rate 21.3%, n=216 · +8 more
Key findings
- Overall, 46 variants were identified in 46/216 (21.3%) tumor samples.
- 28/216 (13%) LCNECs harbored at least one actionable molecular variant potentially targetable by registered or investigational agents.
- KRAS variants were present in 5% of tumors (including G12C at 2%).
- PIK3CA variants were present in 5% of tumors.
- RET single-nucleotide variants were observed in 3% of tumors.
- Uncommon EGFR variants were observed in 1% of tumors; BRAF class II and III variants were observed at <1%.
- A novel in-frame gene fusion (TMEM79::NTRK1) was identified in a single tumor sample (0.5%).
- No classical EGFR exon 18-21 mutations nor ALK, FGFR1/2/3, or ROS1 alterations (mutations or fusions) were detected.
Limitations: Retrospective study design.; Targeted NGS panel limited to 17 genes, so alterations outside the panel would not be detected.; Single-country (Polish) cohort which may limit generalizability.; No clinical outcome or treatment-response data reported in the abstract to link variants to patient benefit..
AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed · Jun 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed · Full text
Human · observationalMechanismInconclusiveLimited evidenceTier 3 · early humann = 114
Journal of clinical medicine · Sep 2023 · retrospective cohort study
gastric large-cell neuroendocrine carcinomagastric small-cell neuroendocrine carcinomagastric neuroendocrine carcinoma
This retrospective study compared clinical characteristics and overall survival between gastric large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (GLNEC, n=82) and gastric small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (GSNEC, n=32) in 114 patients treated at a single center, with external validation using the SEER dataset. Clinicopathologic features and 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates did not differ significantly between GLNEC and GSNEC. The authors report that SEER analysis using inverse probability of treatment weighting confirmed the lack of significant survival difference.
Reported effects: 1-year overall survival 89%, p no statistically significant differences, n=114 · 3-year overall survival 60.5%, p no statistically significant differences, n=114 · +1 more
Key findings
- 114 GNEC patients completed treatment at the study center (GLNEC n=82; GSNEC n=32).
- No clinicopathologic differences were observed between GSNEC and GLNEC for sex, age, BMI, Charlson Comorbidity Index, tumor location, tumor size, stage, treatment received, neuroendocrine markers (CD56, Chromogranin A, synaptophysin), and Ki-67 index.
- The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year overall survival rates of GLNEC were 89.0%, 60.5%, and 52.4%; for GSNEC they were 93.8%, 56.3%, and 52.7%; these showed no statistically significant differences.
- The lack of significant prognostic difference between GLNEC and GSNEC was further confirmed using the SEER dataset after inverse probability of treatment weighting.
Limitations: Retrospective, observational design subject to confounding and selection bias.; Single-center clinical cohort with a relatively small sample, especially for GSNEC (n=32).; Abstract does not report p-values, confidence intervals, or detailed follow-up duration for survival estimates.; SEER-based validation is observational and may have limitations in available covariates and miscoding..
AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed · Jun 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed · Full text
Case reportReported negativeLimited evidenceTier 3 · early humann = 1
Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism case reports · Dec 2022 · case report
prostate large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC)thyroid metastasisadrenal metastasis
This case report describes a 78-year-old man with de novo large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the prostate who presented with cervical lymphadenopathy and was found to have a poorly differentiated carcinoma in the thyroid. Imaging, biopsies, cytology and immunohistochemistry were used for diagnosis, and thyroid surgery confirmed LCNEC metastasis; additional metastases were identified in both adrenal glands. The disease was aggressive and the patient died despite treatment. The authors note that de novo prostatic LCNEC is rare, highly aggressive, and often diagnosed at an advanced stage.
Key findings
- Patient was a 78-year-old man with no history of androgen-deprivation therapy who presented with cervical lymphadenopathy.
- Diagnostic approaches included PET/CT, MRI, CT scans, ultrasonography, biopsies, and cytological and immunohistochemical evaluations.
- Findings showed a poorly differentiated carcinoma in the thyroid gland with cervical lymph node enlargement.
- Thyroid surgery revealed that the thyroid lesion was metastasis of large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC).
- Additional metastases were identified in both adrenal glands.
- Despite treatment, the patient died of the disease.
- De novo LCNEC of the prostate is rare, highly aggressive, resistant to most therapeutic agents, has high metastatic potential, and is usually diagnosed at an advanced stage (as stated by the authors).
Limitations: Single-patient case report (n=1) limits generalizability.; No control or comparator group.; Limited clinical detail and no systematic data collection.; No molecular characterization or detailed therapeutic regimen reported in the abstract..
AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed · Jun 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed · Full text
ReviewMixed resultsLimited evidenceTier 3 · early human
Pathology oncology research : POR · Nov 2022 · review
combined large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (CLCNEC)large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC)non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)small cell lung cancer (SCLC)adenocarcinoma-CLCNEC
This review summarizes clinical characteristics, pathological diagnosis, and treatment approaches for pulmonary combined large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (CLCNEC), a rare and generally aggressive lung neuroendocrine tumor. The authors state that complete surgical resection is preferred for early-stage disease; platinum-based small cell lung cancer chemotherapy regimens have shown promising results in postoperative and advanced CLCNEC compared with non-small cell regimens; adenocarcinoma-CLCNEC more often harbors driver mutations and may benefit from targeted therapy; evidence for immunotherapy is currently insufficient.
Studied with: complete surgical resection, platinum-based SCLC chemotherapy regimens, NSCLC-standard regimens, targeted therapy, immunotherapy.
Key findings
- CLCNEC is a rare neuroendocrine tumor related to LCNEC with generally aggressive behavior and poor prognosis.
- Clinical features are nonspecific and reflect the mixed histologic components.
- Because of low incidence, evidence consists mainly of small-scale retrospective studies and case reports.
- Complete surgical resection is preferred in early-stage disease.
- Platinum-based SCLC standard chemotherapy showed promising results in postoperative and advanced CLCNEC compared to NSCLC regimens according to previous research.
- Adenocarcinoma-CLCNEC is more likely to harbor driver gene mutations and may benefit from targeted therapy.
- More clinical trial data are needed to determine benefits of immunotherapy in CLCNEC.
Limitations: Rare disease with low incidence limiting available data.; Existing evidence is from few small-scale retrospective studies and case reports rather than large prospective trials.; No new primary quantitative data presented in this review.; Insufficient clinical trial data on immunotherapy for CLCNEC..
AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed · Jun 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed · Full text
Human · observationalMixed resultsLimited evidenceTier 3 · early humann = 469
Frontiers in oncology · Nov 2022 · retrospective analysis of the SEER database (1988–2015)
cervical large-cell neuroendocrine carcinomaovarian large-cell neuroendocrine carcinomaendometrial large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma
This retrospective SEER database study analyzed 469 patients with gynecologic large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (cervical n=169, ovarian n=219, endometrial n=79) diagnosed from 1988–2015 to assess survival and prognostic factors. The authors report site-specific 5-year overall and cancer-specific survival rates and median survivals (for example, 5-year OS: cervical 35.98%, ovarian 17.84%, endometrial 23.21%). Multivariate analysis identified stage, lymph node metastasis, surgery, and chemotherapy as independent prognostic factors that differed by tumor site. The authors conclude that certain combinations of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy are associated with better survival depending on stage and site.
Reported effects: 5-year OS (cervical LCNEC) 35.98%, n=169 · 5-year OS (ovarian LCNEC) 17.84%, n=219 · +10 more
Studied with: surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy.
Key findings
- Cervical, ovarian, and endometrial LCNEC were observed in 169, 219, and 79 patients, respectively.
- The 5-year OS rates for patients with cervical, ovarian, and endometrial LCNEC were 35.98%, 17.84%, and 23.21%, respectively; the median duration of overall survival was 26, 11, and 11 months in each group.
- The 5-year CSS rates for the three groups were 45.23%, 19.23%, and 31.39%, respectively; the median duration of CSS was 41, 12, and 11 months in each group.
- Multivariate analysis revealed that AJCC stage, lymph node metastasis, and chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors for OS and CSS in patients with cervical LCNEC.
- Lymph node metastasis, surgery, and chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors for OS and CSS in the ovarian group and for OS in the endometrial group; lymph node metastasis and surgery were independent prognostic factors for CSS in the endometrial group.
- Authors concluded surgery alone may help to improve OS and CSS in early-stage cervical LCNEC; surgery+chemotherapy and surgery+radiotherapy may help to improve survival in early-stage ovarian and endometrial LCNEC, respectively; and comprehensive treatment (surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy) should be considered for advanced-stage disease.
Limitations: Retrospective, observational design using registry data.; Potential selection bias and unmeasured confounding inherent to SEER database analyses.; SEER registry does not provide detailed information on chemotherapy regimens, radiation doses, performance status, or comorbidities.; No randomized comparison of treatment strategies..
AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed · Jun 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed · Full text
ReviewMechanismInconclusiveLimited evidenceTier 4 · clinical
Surgical pathology clinics · Mar 2020 · review
pulmonary neuroendocrine tumorstypical carcinoid tumoratypical carcinoid tumorsmall-cell carcinomalarge-cell neuroendocrine carcinomalung
This review summarizes pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors as a spectrum ranging from well-differentiated typical carcinoid to intermediate atypical carcinoid to high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas (small-cell and large-cell). The authors note that immunohistochemistry is often essential for diagnosis and classification, that the atypical carcinoid category has important therapeutic implications, and that distinguishing small-cell carcinoma from large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma affects therapeutic approach.
Key findings
- Pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors form a morphologic spectrum from typical carcinoid to atypical carcinoid to high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas (small-cell and large-cell).
- Immunohistochemistry is helpful and often essential in diagnostics, especially for classifying large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma.
- The intermediate-grade atypical carcinoid group is important because the diagnosis impacts therapy.
- Differentiating pulmonary small-cell carcinoma from large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma is relevant to therapeutic approach despite both being high-grade.
Limitations: Review article; no original experimental or clinical data reported in the abstract.; Abstract does not describe methods (e.g., whether this is a systematic review), so selection bias or comprehensiveness cannot be assessed from the abstract.; No quantitative results, effect sizes, or outcomes reported in the abstract..
Focuses on morphology, diagnostic use of immunohistochemistry, and the clinical importance of distinguishing subtypes of pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors.
AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed · Jun 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed
ReviewInconclusiveLimited evidenceTier 3 · early human
Thoracic surgery clinics · Aug 2014 · review
large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC)non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC)small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC)
This narrative review summarizes surgical management of large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the lung. The authors state LCNEC is an uncommon, aggressive tumor with poorer prognosis than non-small-cell lung carcinoma. Because LCNEC is rare, treatment recommendations are not based on clinical trials but are extrapolated from approaches used for NSCLC and SCLC, and the existing literature on LCNEC is primarily retrospective. The review concludes further studies are needed to define histology-specific characteristics and the optimal therapeutic approach.
Key findings
- LCNEC of the lung is an uncommon, aggressive neoplasm with a poor prognosis compared with NSCLC.
- Treatment recommendations for LCNEC are not based on clinical trials; they are extrapolated from NSCLC and SCLC practice.
- The established literature for LCNEC is primarily retrospective in nature.
- Further studies are needed to clarify histology-specific characteristics and optimal therapy for LCNEC.
Limitations: This is a review article and contains no primary trial data.; The underlying literature is primarily retrospective.; Rarity of LCNEC limits available evidence and prevents trial-based recommendations.; No clinical-trial–based treatment recommendations are available..
AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed · Jun 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed
Human · observationalReported negativeLimited evidenceTier 3 · early human
Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center · Oct 2006 · review of the literature and discussion of the authors' institutional experience
large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lungnon-small-cell lung cancersmall-cell lung cancerlung cancer
This review discusses the authors' experience and the published literature on large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the lung, including evaluation, classification, surgical treatment, results, and prognosis. The authors report that LCNEC shows neuroendocrine morphologic and immunohistochemical features but large-cell morphology, and that surgical series demonstrate worse 5-year actuarial survival and higher recurrence than other non-small-cell lung cancers, even for stage I disease; they conclude accurate differentiation is important and that effective adjuvant therapies are needed.
Key findings
- LCNEC displays morphologic and immunohistochemical characteristics common to neuroendocrine tumors and morphologic features of large-cell carcinomas.
- Surgical resection series have reported 5-year actuarial survival that is far worse than that reported for other histologic variants of NSCLC.
- Patients with LCNEC are more likely to develop recurrent lung cancer and have shorter actuarial survival than patients with other histologic types of NSCLC, even in stage I disease.
- Accurate differentiation of LCNEC from other NSCLC is important to identify patients at highest risk for recurrent disease.
- The authors state that efforts to identify effective adjuvant therapies are needed to improve outcomes for this aggressive tumor type.
Limitations: This is a literature review combined with the authors' experience; no sample size or primary quantitative data are provided in the abstract.; Abstract does not report methods, patient numbers, or statistical analyses.; No randomized trial data or specific adjuvant therapy results are presented in the abstract..
AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed · Jun 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed