Research Radartracking 1,189 published studies · 293 human · 6 safety signals · 42 clinical trials · 44 cancer pages · updated Jul 2026Open the Research Map →

Endometrioid Carcinoma

A plain-English summary of the published research on Endometrioid Carcinoma, reviewed and approved by our editors — not a hand-curated clinical overview.

Research summary · reviewed
Educational only: This page is not medical advice. Coordinate decisions with your oncology team.

Reviewed Jun 2026 · OncoForge editorial · How we review →

AI extractedhuman reviewedsources checkedretractions suppressed· last updated Jun 2026

Evidence at a glanceHuman · observationalMixed results⚠ Studies disagree
47 published studies that name Endometrioid Carcinoma12 human studies approved & graded (trial, observational, or meta-analysis)37 human clinical studies in the Endometrioid Carcinoma corpus621 source documents in the Endometrioid Carcinoma corpus

last checked June 19, 2026

Why this grade?

Human · observationalHuman observational evidence only — no trials.

Computed deterministically from the studies’ types and reported outcomes — not written by AI, and not a claim that anything works.

What the guidelines say

NCI PDQESMONCCNASCO

We link the authoritative guidelines rather than reproduce them. Below, the treatments on this page are split into standard care, guideline or regulatory options, supportive care, and studied but not standard so established care is not mixed with experimental or supportive items.

Studied, not standard - investigational
  • progestins

Read the guidelines

Cancer-specific deep links aren’t curated yet — these search the authoritative sources for Endometrioid Carcinoma.

Treatment map: Endometrioid Carcinoma

Open as a full page →

Standard care plus every compound studied in the literature (each cited) and graded by evidence, organized by clinical readiness. A category, not a verdict that anything works — confirm anything here with your oncology team.

1
Interventions
0
Standard of care
1
Tested in people
0
Lab / animal
0
Named in lit.
1
Classes
Standard of care (0) Guideline option (0) Tested in people (1) Lab / animal only (0) Named in the literature (0)

Tested in people, by trial phase: phase not reported ×1

Investigational & adjunct compounds — detail (1)
Meta-analysis (1)
progestins

"Tested in people" rows show the highest trial phase found in that compound's cited human studies (Phase I–IV; "phase not reported" = a human study with no phase tag). "Studied" = named in the cited literature for this cancer. "FDA ✓" = FDA-approved for this cancer; "off-label" = an FDA-approved drug used outside its approved indications (per openFDA). Not a claim that anything works.

Reported figures

Get cited updates on Endometrioid Carcinoma
A monthly email when the research changes — $10/mo. Manage follows
Follow Endometrioid Carcinoma

Snapshot

The essentials in ~60 seconds — every line is drawn from the cited sources below.

What it is
Endometrioid carcinoma is an endometrial cancer that can be classified into four molecular prognostic subgroups: POLE, microsatellite‑instable (MSI), copy‑number‑high (CNH), and copy‑number‑low (CNL). [1]
Survival
Prognosis differs by molecular subgroup: compared with p53‑wild‑type, pooled hazard ratios for overall survival were p53‑mutated 2.505, MSI 1.287, and POLE‑mutated 0.481; mismatch repair–deficient (MMRd) clear cell cases seem to have a favorable prognosis and might be grouped with MMRd endometrioid carcinoma for management. [2][3]
Standard treatment
Conservative management of endometrial hyperplasia without atypia, atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AH/EIN), and early endometrioid carcinoma is based on progestins. [4]
Key test
Molecular classification (POLE, MSI/MMRd, copy‑number‑high, copy‑number‑low) is a key diagnostic biomarker because its prevalence does not align with FIGO grade and will affect risk stratification. [1][2]
Biggest challenge
Current FIGO‑grade based risk stratification does not align with TCGA molecular subgroups, so integrating molecular signatures (and histotype) into risk classification is a main challenge. [1][2]

Ask about Endometrioid Carcinoma

Answers come only from the cited sources on this page — with the supporting evidence shown. If the sources here don't cover your question, it will say so. Educational information, not medical advice.

Key numbers & factors

Risk factors

  • increases riskAtypical polypoid adenomyoma (APA)may be a precursor of 'copy number-low,' CTNNB1‑mutant endometrial cancers. [5]

Biomarkers

  • POLE mutation · defines the POLE TCGA prognostic subgroup associated with lower overall‑survival hazard (POLEmt HR 0.481). [2]
  • MSI / MMR deficiencyActionableidentifies the MSI/MMRd TCGA subgroup and may influence prognosis and grouping for management (MMRd clear cell may be managed with MMRd endometrioid). [2][3]
  • p53 mutation · identifies the p53‑mutated / copy‑number‑high subgroup associated with worse overall‑survival hazard (p53mt HR 2.505). [2]
  • CTNNB1 mutation · associated with copy‑number‑low endometrial cancers and suggested by APA as a possible precursor. [5]
  • Recurrent gene fusions (ESR1‑NCOA2/3, GREB1‑NCOA1/2, GREB1‑CTNNB1) · reported in uterine tumors resembling ovarian sex cord tumors (UTROSCT). [6]

6 sections — tap any heading to expand its cited detail. Key points are above.

OverviewThe Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) defines four molecular prognostic subgroups of endometrial carcinoma: POLE, microsatellite-instable (MSI), copy-number-high (CNH), and copy-number-low (CNL). A systematic review found that the prevalence of these TCGA molecular subgroups does not align with FIGO grade, indicating that current risk stratification of endometrial carcinoma will be heavily affected by molecular signature.2 points
  • The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) demonstrated four molecular prognostic subgroups for endometrial carcinoma: POLE, microsatellite-instable (MSI), copy-number-high (CNH), and copy-number-low (CNL). [1]
  • A systematic review found that the prevalence of TCGA molecular subgroups does not align with FIGO grade, suggesting that current risk stratification of endometrial carcinoma will be heavily affected by molecular signature. [1]
Key biomarkersCertain precursor lesions and rare uterine tumor types associated with endometrioid carcinoma have characteristic molecular features. Atypical polypoid adenomyoma shows prominent hormone-receptor expression and nuclear β-catenin and has been suggested as a precursor of copy number-low, CTNNB1‑mutant endometrial cancers; uterine tumors resembling ovarian sex cord tumors have recurrent gene fusions.2 points
  • Atypical polypoid adenomyoma (APA) glands appear analogous to atypical endometrial hyperplasia and their prominent hormone-receptor expression and nuclear β-catenin suggest APA may be a precursor of 'copy number-low,' CTNNB1-mutant endometrial cancers. [5]
  • Uterine tumor resembling ovarian sex cord tumors (UTROSCT) have been reported to contain recurrent gene fusions including ESR1-NCOA2/3, GREB1-NCOA1/2 and GREB1-CTNNB1. [6]
Standard management1 point
  • Conservative treatment of endometrial hyperplasia without atypia (HWA), atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AH/EIN) and early endometrioid carcinoma (EEC) is based on progestins. [4]
Treatments & compounds studied1 treatment

Hormonal therapy

  • progestins: Conservative treatment of HWA, AH/EIN and early endometrioid carcinoma is based on progestins. [4]
    Overall association of diabetes mellitus with treatment outcome 1.2, p=0.62 vs patients without diabetes mellitus
    Source quote
    • Overall, diabetes mellitus was not associated with outcome of treatment (OR = 1.20; p = .62).
PrognosisTCGA-defined molecular subgroups of endometrioid carcinoma show different pooled hazard ratios for overall survival relative to the p53-wild-type subgroup (p53mt 2.505; MSI 1.287; POLEmt 0.481). Mismatch repair–deficient (MMRd) clear cell endometrial carcinomas appear to have a favorable prognosis and "might be lumped together with MMRd endometrioid carcinoma for management purpose."2 points

Key figures

Survival & outcomes
OutcomeValue95% CI
five-year overall survival in MMRd CCC95.7%
Prognostic factors
FactorEffectHR (95% CI)p
HR for overall survival in p53mt (endometrioid)▲ worse2.505
hazard of death MMRd vs p53abn vs p53abn group▼ better0.062= 0.007
HR for overall survival in POLEmt (endometrioid)▼ better0.481
HR for overall survival in MSI (endometrioid)▲ worse1.287
Source quotes
  • Five-year OS was 95.7 ± 4.3% in the MMRd group, 48.4 ± 8.4% months in the p53wt group and 40.6 ± 10.4% in the p53abn group.
  • In the p53mt subgroup, pooled HRs for OS were 4.322 (all-histotypes), 2.505 (endometrioid), and 4.937 (non-endometrioid).
  • The hazard of death was significantly lower in the MMRd group than in the p53abn group (HR = 0.062; p = 0.007), while it did not significantly differ between the p53wt and the p53abn group (HR = 0.673; p = 0.222).
  • In the POLEmt subgroup, pooled HRs were 0.763 (all-histotypes), 0.481 (endometrioid), and 2.634 (non-endometrioid).
  • In the MSI subgroup, pooled HRs were 1.965 (all-histotypes), 1.287 (endometrioid), and 6.361 (non-endometrioid).
  • In endometrioid carcinomas (TCGA molecular subgroups), pooled hazard ratios for overall survival compared with the p53-wild-type subgroup were: p53-mutated (p53mt) 2.505; MSI (microsatellite-instability) 1.287; and POLE-mutated (POLEmt) 0.481. [2]
  • Mismatch repair–deficient (MMRd) clear cell endometrial carcinomas seem to have a favorable prognosis and "might be lumped together with MMRd endometrioid carcinoma for management purpose." [3]
What we don't know yet1 point
  • Authors have recommended that histotype should be integrated with molecular characterization for risk stratification of patients in the future. [2]

Common questions

What is Endometrioid Carcinoma?

The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) defines four molecular prognostic subgroups of endometrial carcinoma: POLE, microsatellite-instable (MSI), copy-number-high (CNH), and copy-number-low (CNL). A systematic review found that the prevalence of these TCGA molecular subgroups does not align with FIGO grade, indicating that current risk stratification of endometrial carcinoma will be heavily affected by molecular signature.

Which biomarkers are important in Endometrioid Carcinoma?

Certain precursor lesions and rare uterine tumor types associated with endometrioid carcinoma have characteristic molecular features. Atypical polypoid adenomyoma shows prominent hormone-receptor expression and nuclear β-catenin and has been suggested as a precursor of copy number-low, CTNNB1‑mutant endometrial cancers; uterine tumors resembling ovarian sex cord tumors have recurrent gene fusions.

What is the prognosis for Endometrioid Carcinoma?

TCGA-defined molecular subgroups of endometrioid carcinoma show different pooled hazard ratios for overall survival relative to the p53-wild-type subgroup (p53mt 2.505; MSI 1.287; POLEmt 0.481). Mismatch repair–deficient (MMRd) clear cell endometrial carcinomas appear to have a favorable prognosis and "might be lumped together with MMRd endometrioid carcinoma for management purpose."

Sources

Every statement above is drawn from these reviewed sources. This page reports what they describe. Sources last checked June 19, 2026.

  1. Meta-analysisTCGA molecular subgroups and FIGO grade in endometrial endometrioid carcinoma · 2020
  2. Meta-analysisImpact of endometrial carcinoma histotype on the prognostic value of the TCGA molecular subgroups · 2020
  3. Meta-analysisClear cell endometrial carcinomas with mismatch repair deficiency have a favorable prognosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis · 2021
  4. Systematic reviewDiabetes mellitus and responsiveness of endometrial hyperplasia and early endometrial cancer to conservative treatment · 2019
  5. Systematic reviewImmunophenotype of Atypical Polypoid Adenomyoma of the Uterus: Diagnostic Value and Insight on Pathogenesis · 2020
  6. Systematic reviewUterine lesions with sex cord-like architectures: a systematic review · 2019

What supports this page

The kinds of sources behind this page, strongest at the top. Faint rungs show what is not here yet.

Guideline
3
Meta-analysis
12
Systematic review
8
Randomized trial
1
Clinical trial
25
Observational
5
Case report
111
Review
445
Preclinical
0
Other
11

Living document — last change June 19, 2026: Cancer page updated. 2 recent updates logged.

What recent studies report in Endometrioid Carcinoma

These are reviewed studies whose abstracts concern Endometrioid Carcinoma. Each describes only what that study reported. This is not a claim by OncoForge that any compound helps or harms Endometrioid Carcinoma. Most are early lab, animal, or small human studies, and findings often conflict.

47 studies12 human⚠ Conflicting evidenceMechanism (41)

Tracking 47 published studies of Endometrioid Carcinoma: 12 in humans, 35 reviews/other.

Reported direction across studies: 16 positive, 10 mixed, 21 inconclusive.

Findings conflict — both supportive and negative/mixed results exist (see below). Human evidence is limited.

These counts summarize what the studies reported; they are not a measure of whether anything works for Endometrioid Carcinoma.

ReviewMechanismMixed resultsModerate evidenceTier 4 · clinical

Molecular Pathology of Ovarian Endometrioid Carcinoma: A Review

Oncology research · Nov 2025 · narrative review

ovarian endometrioid carcinomaepithelial ovarian cancer

This narrative review summarizes contemporary evidence about ovarian endometrioid carcinoma (OEC), applying the endometrial cancer molecular taxonomy (POLE‑ultramutated, MMRd, p53‑abnormal, NSMP) to OEC. The authors report that OEC is enriched for Lynch syndrome and recommend routine MMR testing; POLEmut/MMRd tumors generally have favorable outcomes and may be candidates for de‑escalation or immunotherapy, while p53‑abnormal/high‑grade tumors have poorer prognosis and may need intensified management or HRD‑directed strategies.

Reported effect: proportion_of_epithelial_ovarian_cancers 10%

Studied with: immune checkpoint inhibitors, HRD-directed strategies.

Key findings
  • Ovarian endometrioid carcinoma (OEC) accounts for ~10% of epithelial ovarian cancers and displays broad morphologic diversity that complicates diagnosis and grading.
  • The endometrial cancer molecular taxonomy (POLE‑ultramutated, MMRd, p53‑abnormal, NSMP) also applies to OEC.
  • OEC is enriched for Lynch syndrome‑associated tumors, supporting routine MMR testing.
  • Integrating morphology with molecular classification refines diagnosis and prognostication.
  • POLEmut/MMRd subsets generally have excellent outcomes and are candidates for de‑escalation or immunotherapy.
  • p53abn/high‑grade tumors carry a poorer prognosis and may warrant intensified management and trials of HRD‑directed strategies.
  • Routine MMR immunohistochemistry with reflex germline testing improves Lynch detection.
  • Future priorities include prospective validation and multi‑omics to refine NSMP and identify new targets.
Limitations: Narrative review rather than primary research; no new patient‑level data reported.; Recommendations (e.g., de‑escalation, therapeutic strategies) lack prospective validation in OEC as noted by the authors.; Broad morphologic diversity and diagnostic/grading challenges in OEC may limit generalizability of some recommendations.; NSMP group remains heterogeneous and requires further molecular refinement per the authors..

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed · Jun 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed · Full text

Case reportMechanismInconclusiveLimited evidenceTier 3 · early humann = 3

High-grade endometrioid carcinomas with pilomatrix-like features lacking CTNNB1 Mutations: Clinicopathologic characteristics and novel molecular events

Human pathology · Oct 2025 · case series

endometrial carcinomaendometrioid carcinomapilomatrix-like high-grade endometrioid carcinoma (PiMHEC)

The authors report three human cases of high-grade endometrioid carcinoma with pilomatrix-like features (PiMHEC) that lacked CTNNB1 exon 3 mutations and nuclear β-catenin by IHC. All tumors had characteristic pilomatrix-like morphology, presented at advanced stage, showed aggressive clinical behavior (two recurrences within 12 months), and targeted NGS identified alternative likely oncogenic alterations including FGFR4 p.T259A, TSC2 mutations, KRAS p.G12D, and MYC amplification.

Reported effects: number_of_cases 3, n=3 · patients_presenting_with_advanced_stage_disease 3, n=3 · +6 more

Key findings
  • Three cases of high-grade endometrioid carcinoma with pilomatrix-like features were analyzed.
  • All tumors demonstrated two components: a high-grade basaloid component with solid sheets of atypical basaloid cells, geographic necrosis, and focal "ghost" cells, and an associated low-grade FIGO grade 1 endometrioid carcinoma component.
  • None of the three cases showed nuclear β-catenin expression by IHC, and all lacked CTNNB1 exon 3 mutations.
  • All the patients presented with advanced-stage disease (stages IIC-IVB).
  • Two patients had a recurrence within 12 months.
  • NGS revealed no CTNNB1 mutations, but identified alternative likely oncogenic alterations: one tumor harbored an FGFR4 p. T259A mutation, two tumors had pathogenic TSC2 mutations, one had a KRAS p.G12D mutation, and two showed MYC amplification.
Limitations: Very small sample size (n=3) and single case-series design.; Case reports are descriptive and cannot establish causal relationships between identified mutations and the PiMHEC phenotype.; No functional validation provided to show that the alternative oncogenic alterations drive the pilomatrix-like phenotype.; Limited follow-up data reported (recurrence noted within 12 months for two patients), limiting assessment of long-term outcomes and prognostic significance..

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed · Jun 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed

Case reportMechanismInconclusiveLimited evidenceTier 3 · early humann = 1

High-grade Endometrial Endometrioid Carcinoma: A Case Report of Complete Transdifferentiation to Pilomatrix-like Carcinoma

International journal of surgical pathology · Sep 2025 · Case report

Endometrial endometrioid carcinomaPilomatrix-like high-grade endometrioid carcinoma

This is a single-patient case report of a 56-year-old woman whose high-grade endometrial endometrioid carcinoma showed complete transdifferentiation to a pilomatrix-like carcinoma pattern, with metastases to ovaries and lymph nodes. Pathology showed basaloid cells with ghost cell keratinization, aberrant cytoplasmic and nuclear β-catenin expression, focal CDX2, absent PAX8 and ER/PR, and NGS identified a CTNNB1 (p.Ser37Phe) mutation with a variant allele frequency of 18.6%. The authors note this tumor is rare, diagnostically challenging, presented at high stage, and it is unknown whether standard adjuvant therapies are effective for this subtype.

Reported effect: CTNNB1 variant allele frequency 18.6%, n=1

Key findings
  • Hysterectomy specimen confirmed high-grade endometrioid carcinoma with secondary involvement of both ovaries, left tubo-ovarian ligament and obturator lymph nodes.
  • Microscopically the tumor had a solid, nested/insular pattern with peripheral basaloid cells, central ghost cell keratinization, and extensive geographic necrosis.
  • No low-grade endometrioid carcinoma component was identified in the primary tumor or metastases after extensive sampling.
  • Immunohistochemistry showed aberrant cytoplasmic and nuclear expression of β-catenin, focal CDX2 expression, and negativity for PAX8 and estrogen and progesterone receptors (ER/PR).
  • Next-generation sequencing found a CTNNB1 pathogenic mutation (p.Ser37Phe, c.110C > T) with a variant allele frequency of 18.6%.
  • Based on morphology, immunohistochemistry and NGS analysis, the diagnosis of pilomatrix-like high-grade endometrioid carcinoma was established.
Limitations: Single-patient case report — findings may not be generalizable.; No data presented on treatment given or therapeutic outcomes for this patient.; Follow-up and clinical outcome details are not reported in the abstract.; Unable to assess effectiveness of standard adjuvant therapies for this subtype from this report..

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed · Jun 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed

Human · observationalMechanismMixed resultsLimited evidenceTier 3 · early humann = 18

Exploring the Genetic and Clinical Landscape of Dedifferentiated Endometrioid Carcinoma

International journal of molecular sciences · Apr 2025

dedifferentiated endometrioid carcinomaendometrial cancer

This observational study analyzed 18 Japanese cases of dedifferentiated endometrioid carcinoma, with immunostaining on tumor components and whole-exome sequencing in three cases. The authors report that DDEC comprised 2.0% of endometrial cancers, had poor 5-year outcomes (PFS ≈40%, OS ≈30%), and that 66.7% of patients were mismatch repair deficient; they found differing mutation patterns between well-differentiated and undifferentiated components and suggest several targeted therapies could be relevant based on genetics.

Reported effects: incidence of DDEC among endometrial cancers 2% · 5-year progression-free survival 40% · +2 more

Key findings
  • Incidence of DDEC was 2.0% among endometrial cancers.
  • The 5-year progression-free survival for DDEC was approximately 40%.
  • The 5-year overall survival for DDEC was approximately 30%.
  • Immunohistochemistry indicated 66.7% of patients were mismatch repair deficient.
  • The rate of p53 mutations in this series was higher than reported previously, and p53 mutations in undifferentiated components were associated with poor prognosis.
  • Whole-exome sequencing (n = 3) showed different gene mutations and mutation signatures between well-differentiated and undifferentiated components.
  • New genetic mutations in undifferentiated regions were uncommon in the three sequenced cases.
  • Among the three sequenced cases: one showed homologous recombination deficiency, and the other two had MSI-high and hypermutator phenotypes.
  • Authors suggest that immune checkpoint inhibitors, PARP inhibitors, and drugs targeting the p53 pathway may be therapeutically relevant to DDEC based on the genetic findings.
Limitations: Small overall sample size (18 cases); Whole-exome sequencing performed in only 3 cases; Observational, descriptive design with no interventional testing of suggested therapies; Single-country (Japanese) cohort which may limit generalizability; No functional validation of suggested therapeutic targets reported in the abstract.

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed · Jun 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed · Full text

Case reportMechanismInconclusiveLimited evidenceTier 3 · early humann = 2

High-grade corded and hyalinized endometrioid carcinoma of "no specific molecular profile": report of two cases

Pathologica · Feb 2025 · case report (two cases)

corded and hyalinized endometrioid carcinomaendometrioid carcinomaendometrial carcinoma

This paper reports two human cases of high-grade corded and hyalinized endometrioid carcinoma (CHEC) that showed a "no specific molecular profile" (NSMP). Both tumors had a markedly atypical, mitotically active corded component merging with FIGO G3 endometrioid carcinoma and squamous/morular differentiation, and both showed nuclear β-catenin accumulation, retained mismatch repair protein expression, wild-type p53 pattern, and no POLE mutations. The authors note heterogeneity in age and presentation (patients aged 25 and 81) and suggest these tumors be considered a variant of FIGO G3 endometrioid carcinoma.

Reported effects: number_of_cases 2 · tumor_size_case1 6 · +2 more

Key findings
  • Both cases demonstrated a markedly atypical and mitotically active corded component merging with a FIGO G3 endometrioid component and accompanied by squamous/morular differentiation.
  • Both tumors showed nuclear β-catenin accumulation, retained MMR protein expression, wild-type p53 pattern, and no POLE mutations.
  • Case #1 was a 6-cm endometrial mass in a 25-year-old woman, infiltrating the deep myometrium and cervical stroma, with diffuse lymphovascular space invasion.
  • Case #2 was an advanced, unresectable endometrial carcinoma involving the lower third of the vagina in an 81-year-old woman.
  • The corded component was absent in the hysterectomy specimen of case #1 and in the vaginal biopsy specimen of case #2.
  • Authors conclude these cases expand the clinical and molecular heterogeneity of high-grade CHEC and suggest considering them as a variant of FIGO G3 endometrioid carcinoma.
Limitations: Very small sample size (two cases) — case report-level evidence.; Descriptive pathology series without systematic follow-up or outcome data reported in the abstract.; No control or comparison group.; Methods for molecular testing (e.g., POLE testing) and detailed molecular data are not provided in the abstract.; Findings may not be generalizable..

Pathology case report that expands the morphological and molecular spectrum of high-grade corded and hyalinized endometrioid carcinoma (CHEC) by describing two human cases with NSMP.

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed · Jun 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed · Full text

Case reportMechanismInconclusiveLimited evidenceTier 3 · early humann = 2

POLE-mutated Endometrial "Carcinosarcoma"

International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists · Jan 2025 · Case report (2 cases)

Endometrial carcinomaCarcinosarcomaEndometrioid carcinoma

The authors report two cases that were morphologically suspicious for endometrial carcinosarcoma but did not meet essential diagnostic criteria. Molecular testing identified pathogenic POLE mutations in both cases, and the tumors were described as low-grade endometrioid carcinomas with a homologous sarcoma component. The report questions the existence of a true POLE-mutated carcinosarcoma entity.

Key findings
  • Two cases had morphologic suspicion for endometrial carcinosarcoma but lacked essential criteria for that diagnosis.
  • Pathogenic POLE mutations were detected on molecular testing in both cases.
  • A descriptive diagnosis rendered was endometrial endometrioid carcinomas, low-grade, with a homologous sarcoma component.
  • These observations challenge the existence of POLE-mutated 'carcinosarcoma.'
Limitations: Very small sample size (2 cases).; Case report design without a systematic series or controls.; No clinical follow-up, treatment, or outcome data reported in the abstract.; Abstract provides limited pathological and methodological detail..

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed · Jun 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed

Human · observationalMechanismReported positiveModerate evidenceTier 3 · early humann = 122

STK11 (LKB1) immunohistochemistry is a sensitive and specific marker for STK11 adnexal tumours

Histopathology · Nov 2024 · immunohistochemical analysis of a cohort of human tumours (122 cases) including STK11 adnexal tumours and morphological mimics

STK11 adnexal tumourovarian neoplasmsovarian endometrioid carcinomatubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinomaovarian mesonephric-like adenocarcinomaovarian carcinosarcomaperitoneal malignant mesotheliomapelvic plexiform leiomyomaovarian solid pseudopapillary tumourgranulosa cell tumourSertoli-Leydig cell tumourLeydig cell tumourSertoli cell tumoursteroid cell tumourfemale adnexal tumour of Wolffian originextra-ovarian sex cord-stromal tumour

Researchers performed STK11 (LKB1) immunohistochemistry on 122 human tumour samples, including 17 STK11 adnexal tumours and 105 morphological mimics. All 17 STK11 adnexal tumours showed complete loss of cytoplasmic STK11 staining. Nearly all other tumour types retained cytoplasmic STK11 staining, with the exception of one endometrioid carcinoma with mucinous differentiation showing complete loss and one high-grade serous carcinoma showing subclonal loss. The authors conclude STK11 IHC is a highly sensitive and specific marker for distinguishing STK11 adnexal tumour in the appropriate morphological context and could obviate confirmatory molecular testing.

Reported effects: total tumours tested 122, n=122 · STK11 adnexal tumours included 17, n=17 · +3 more

Key findings
  • IHC for STK11 was performed on 122 tumours, including 17 STK11 adnexal tumours and 105 morphological mimics (full list of mimics given in abstract).
  • All STK11 adnexal tumours showed complete loss of cytoplasmic staining for STK11.
  • All other tumour types showed retained cytoplasmic staining, except for one endometrioid carcinoma with mucinous differentiation which showed complete loss of STK11 expression and a high-grade serous carcinoma with subclonal loss.
  • Authors conclude STK11 IHC is a highly sensitive and specific immunohistochemical marker for distinguishing STK11 adnexal tumour from histological mimics and may obviate the need for confirmatory molecular studies in the appropriate morphological context.
Limitations: Small number of STK11 adnexal tumours (n=17), reflecting rarity of the entity.; Study reports a single cohort with no external validation cohort mentioned in the abstract.; Potential selection bias because tumour types were a selected set of morphological mimics.; Abstract does not report blinding, interobserver reproducibility, or diagnostic performance statistics (sensitivity/specificity values) beyond descriptive counts.; Two non-STK11 tumours showed loss/subclonal loss of STK11, indicating imperfect specificity in this cohort..

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed · Jun 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed · Full text

Human · observationalMechanismMixed resultsLimited evidenceTier 3 · early humann = 289

Molecular classification of ovarian high-grade serous/endometrioid carcinomas through multi-omics analysis: JGOG3025-TR2 study

British journal of cancer · Nov 2024 · multi-omics molecular profiling of tumor cohort (targeted DNA sequencing, RNA sequencing, DNA methylation array, SNP array) with unsupervised clustering

ovarian high-grade endometrioid carcinoma (HGEC)ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC)endometrial high-grade carcinoma

The authors performed multi-omics profiling (DNA/RNA sequencing, methylation, SNP arrays) of ovarian high-grade endometrioid and serous carcinomas from the JGOG-TR2 cohort and analyzed public TCGA data. They identified four copy-number-based tumor groups (C1–C4); one group (C4, denoted 'HGEC-type') showed endometrium-like methylation, lack of BRCA1/2 alterations and CCNE1 amplification, low HRD scores, and more favorable prognosis.

Reported effects: JGOG-TR2 HGEC sample count 15 · JGOG-TR2 HGSC sample count 274 · +6 more

Key findings
  • Unsupervised clustering using copy number signatures identified four distinct tumor groups (C1, C2, C3 and C4).
  • C1 (n = 41) showed CCNE1 amplification and poor survival.
  • C2 (n = 160) and C3 (n = 59) showed high BRCA1/2 alteration frequency with low and moderate ploidy, respectively.
  • C4 (n = 22) was characterized by favorable outcome, higher HGEC proportion, no BRCA1/2 alteration or CCNE1 amplification, and low levels of HRD score, ploidy, intra-tumoral heterogeneity, cell proliferation rate, and WT1 gene expression.
  • C4 exhibited a normal endometrium-like DNA methylation profile and was defined as 'HGEC-type' tumors, which were also identified in TCGA-OV and TCGA-UCEC.
Limitations: Observational, cross-sectional molecular profiling without interventional or functional validation.; Relatively small number of HGEC samples in the primary cohort (15 HGEC samples) and small size of the C4 subgroup (n = 22).; Prognostic associations are reported but the abstract does not detail adjustment for potential clinical confounders or independent validation beyond TCGA re-analysis.; No therapeutic implications or prospective clinical validation provided in the abstract..

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed · Jun 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed · Full text

Human · observationalMechanismReported positiveLimited evidenceTier 3 · early human

Mesothelin promotes the migration of endometrioid carcinoma and is associated with the MELF pattern

Pathology, research and practice · Oct 2024 · Laser microdissection and RNA sequencing comparing EC with the MELF pattern; generation of MSLN-knockout and -knockdown endometrioid carcinoma cell lines for functional assays; immunohistochemical analysis of clinical tumor samples and comparison of blood CA125 levels.

endometrioid carcinomaendometrial neoplasms

The authors found mesothelin (MSLN) expression was predominant in endometrioid carcinoma cases with the MELF pattern. In cell-line experiments, MSLN promoted cell migration and epithelial–mesenchymal transition and regulated cadherin-6 (CDH6); CA125 was shown to regulate CDH6 via MSLN. Immunohistochemistry and blood measurements showed higher MSLN, CA125, and CDH6 in tumors with the MELF pattern.

Key findings
  • MSLN was predominantly expressed in endometrioid carcinoma cases with the MELF pattern identified by laser microdissection and RNA sequencing.
  • MSLN promoted migration and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in MSLN-knockout and -knockdown endometrioid carcinoma cell lines.
  • Cadherin-6 (CDH6) expression was regulated by MSLN.
  • CA125 can regulate CDH6 expression via MSLN.
  • Immunohistochemical analyses showed MSLN, CA125, and CDH6 expression levels were considerably elevated in endometrioid carcinoma with the MELF pattern.
  • CA125 expression in tumors paralleled MSLN in staining intensity and also matched blood CA125 level patterns reported.
Limitations: Abstract does not report sample sizes for the clinical/immunohistochemical analyses.; Mechanistic functional data derive from cell-line (in vitro) knockout/knockdown models, not from in vivo models.; Correlative immunohistochemical findings do not prove causation in human tumors.; No clinical outcomes or intervention trial data are reported to link MSLN expression to patient prognosis or therapy response..

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed · Jun 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed

Human · observationalMechanismMixed resultsLimited evidenceTier 3 · early humann = 96

Correlation between immunohistochemical staining and clinicopathological findings in endometrial carcinoma

Saudi medical journal · Jun 2024

endometrial carcinomaendometrioid carcinomapapillary serous carcinomaclear cell carcinomamixed Müllerian tumor

The authors analyzed immunohistochemical staining for mismatch repair (MMR) proteins and p53 in 96 endometrial carcinoma cases across multiple histologic subtypes. They found 36 cases were MMR-deficient (mostly endometrioid) and that a subset showed a p53 mutational staining pattern which was associated with a dismal prognosis. However, these stains did not predict synchronous or metachronous cancers in five patients. The authors conclude that MMR and p53 IHC are important for classification and prognosis of endometrial carcinoma.

Key findings
  • Total of 96 endometrial carcinoma cases analyzed (72 endometrioid, 14 papillary serous, 5 clear cell, 5 mixed Müllerian).
  • 36 cases were MMR deficient, with the majority being of endometrioid subtype.
  • p53 immunostain showed a mutational pattern in a subset of cases, which was associated with a documented dismal prognosis.
  • MMR and p53 immunohistochemical stains failed to predict synchronous or metachronous cancers in 5 patients.
  • Authors highlight the importance of MMR and p53 IHC in classification and prognosis of endometrial carcinoma.
Limitations: Observational immunohistochemical study without details of study design in abstract (e.g., retrospective vs prospective).; Small numbers in several histologic subgroups (e.g., clear cell and mixed Müllerian tumor, n=5 each).; Abstract reports no statistical measures, effect sizes, confidence intervals, or p-values to quantify associations.; No follow-up duration or method for determining 'dismal prognosis' reported in the abstract — prognosis definition and timing unclear.; IHC associations cannot establish causality and prognostic performance (sensitivity/specificity) is not reported..

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed · Jun 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed · Full text

Case reportReported positiveLimited evidenceTier 3 · early humann = 1

Endometrioid carcinomas with sex cord-like formations and hyalinization: spontaneous pregnancy after conservative treatment

BMC pregnancy and childbirth · Jan 2024 · case report

corded and hyalinized endometrioid adenocarcinoma (CHEC)endometrial carcinomaendometrioid carcinoma

This single-case report describes a 23-year-old woman with presumed stage IA corded and hyalinized endometrioid adenocarcinoma (CHEC) who received fertility-sparing conservative treatment and achieved a complete response after 10 months. She subsequently conceived spontaneously and delivered a healthy male infant, with no signs of recurrence during 37 months of follow-up after complete response.

Reported effects: time_to_complete_response 10 mo, n=1 · recurrence_free_followup 37 mo, n=1

Key findings
  • A 23-year-old nulliparous patient with presumed stage IA CHEC received fertility-sparing treatment and achieved complete response (CR) after 10 months of conservative treatment.
  • The patient subsequently became pregnant spontaneously, successfully conceived, and gave birth to a healthy male neonate.
  • There were no signs of recurrence during 37 months follow-up after CR.
  • CHEC is a rare variant not currently included in fertility-sparing guidelines; this case suggests fertility-sparing treatment may be an option for highly selected patients, with continuous follow-up required.
Limitations: Single-patient case report limits generalizability.; Abstract does not specify the exact conservative treatment regimen or detailed management protocol.; No control or comparison group.; Long-term outcomes beyond the reported 37 months are unknown..

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed · Jul 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed · Full text

Human · observationalMechanismMixed resultsLimited evidenceTier 3 · early humann = 140

Identifying clinical features and molecular characteristics of the endometrial clear cell carcinoma

Frontiers in oncology · Nov 2023

endometrial clear cell carcinomaendometrioid carcinoma

This observational study compared clinical features of 28 endometrial clear cell carcinoma (ECCC) patients with 112 endometrioid carcinoma patients and applied TCGA classification to 19 ECCCs. ECCC patients were older and had higher rates of myometrial invasion and LVSI; among ECCCs, LVSI was associated with poorer prognosis. Of 19 ECCCs, the TCGA subtypes included POLEmut (10.5%), MMRd (15.8%), p53wt (57.9%), and p53abn (15.8%); 31.6% were HER-2 positive and 42.1% had TAF1 expression loss. The authors report that HER-2 positivity and TAF1 loss were associated with worse outcomes in ECCC.

Reported effects: median age 64.5, n=28 · myometrial invasion rate 42.8%, n=28 · +7 more

Key findings
  • ECCC had older age of onset (median age, 64.5 years, range 31-81 years).
  • ECCC showed higher rate of myometrial invasion (42.8% vs. 21.5% in endometrioid carcinoma).
  • ECCC showed higher LVSI (33% vs. 16%).
  • Among the ECCCs, LVSI was a poor prognostic factor.
  • TCGA classification of 19 ECCCs: POLEmut 10.5% (2/19), MMRd 15.8% (3/19), p53wt 57.9% (11/19), p53abn 15.8% (3/19).
  • Of 19 ECCCs, six (31.6%) showed HER-2 positive expression and eight (42.1%) had TAF1 expression loss.
  • The authors report ECCCs with HER-2 and TAF1 expression had worse outcomes.
Limitations: Small ECCC sample (28 cases; only 19 underwent TCGA classification).; Observational design without randomized or controlled assignment.; Abstract does not report numerical survival statistics (HRs, median survival) or multivariable analyses, limiting assessment of effect sizes and confounding..

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed · Jun 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed · Full text

Browse all studies mentioning Endometrioid Carcinoma

Study mix

47 published studies by what they were done in. Lab and animal findings often do not carry over to people.

12 Human35 Review/other
Reported directionReported positive16Mixed results10Inconclusive21

What the research shows for Endometrioid Carcinoma

A plain-language summary of the reviewed studies OncoForge tracks for Endometrioid Carcinoma. It reports what those studies described, not a claim that any compound or therapy helps or harms Endometrioid Carcinoma. Most of this evidence is early, and findings often conflict.

  • Narrative reviews summarize pathology, immunohistochemical markers, and molecular features used to diagnose and subclassify endometrioid and related ovarian tumors; these reviews highlight links between ovarian endometrioid carcinoma and endometriosis and between some tumors and hereditary (Lynch/HNPCC) syndromes.
  • An expert consensus review addressed diagnostic challenges in high-grade endometrial carcinomas and recommended morphologic criteria and immunohistochemical marker panels to help distinguish FIGO grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma from serous and other high-grade subtypes.
  • A review of ovarian clear cell carcinoma literature contrasts clinical features (younger age at diagnosis for some patients, relative platinum resistance, and higher thromboembolic risk) and notes differences in behavior compared with other epithelial ovarian cancers; some findings are more established for clear cell histology than for endometrioid histology.
  • A small observational human study comparing endometrial clear cell carcinoma and endometrioid carcinoma reported that clear cell cases were older and had higher rates of myometrial invasion and lymphovascular space invasion; the study applied TCGA molecular classification to a subset of tumors, with limited and mixed results.

Supportive & alternative options discussed

  • Exercise / prehabilitation: Also discussed as a supportive option for people with endometrial cancer to improve fitness, fatigue, and quality of life; these supportive benefits are separate from the pathology- and biomarker-focused studies summarized above.
  • Mind–body (MBSR / CBT): Also discussed as a supportive option for coping with cancer-related stress, anxiety, and quality-of-life concerns in endometrial cancer care; such supportive approaches are not the focus of the studies summarized here.
  • Acupuncture: Also discussed as a supportive option for symptom control (for example, pain or nausea) in gynecologic cancer care; this was not evaluated in the pathology, biomarker, and observational studies summarized above.
  • Hyperthermia (heat): Also discussed in some clinical contexts as an adjunctive local treatment modality for gynecologic tumors, but the reviews and observational study summarized here do not provide evidence about its use in endometrioid carcinoma specifically.
  • Ketogenic / metabolic therapy: Also discussed by some as a supportive dietary approach for people with cancer, but the articles summarized here do not evaluate ketogenic diets in endometrioid carcinoma.

What we don’t know yet

  • Do the described biomarkers and molecular classifications reliably predict clinical outcomes or guide treatment decisions for endometrioid carcinoma in prospective, appropriately powered studies?
  • How well do findings from ovarian endometrioid and clear cell tumor reviews apply to endometrial (uterine) endometrioid carcinoma, given tumor-site biological differences?
  • What are the optimal diagnostic algorithms (including which immunohistochemical panels to use) in routine practice across diverse pathology settings?
  • Are there large, controlled clinical studies validating the prognostic or therapeutic implications of the molecular subgroups described (for example, TCGA classes) specifically in endometrioid carcinoma?
The available literature summarized here is mostly narrative reviews and a small observational study focusing on pathology, biomarkers, and clinical features; it does not establish causal effects or definitive clinical benefits and is limited by small samples and heterogeneous tumor sites.

Clinical trials in Endometrioid Carcinoma

47 ongoing · 55 completed · tracked from ClinicalTrials.gov. Recruiting is not the same as proven, and completed is not the same as positive — read the results. Not a recommendation.

Completed
25 stopped (terminated / withdrawn / suspended)

Search all trials on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Getting care & support

Nonprofit / Gov

Practical, vetted help for Endometrioid Carcinoma — advocacy, paying for treatment, second opinions, and caregivers.

If you’re struggling emotionally, you don’t have to wait.

Advocacy & community

No dedicated organization for this specific cancer is curated yet — these general organizations can help in the meantime.

Financial help

  • PAN FoundationCopay assistance funds by diagnosis (funds open and close as money allows). · status changes often — check the fund’s site
  • HealthWell FoundationCopay and premium assistance funds by disease. · status changes often — check the fund’s site
  • CancerCare — financial assistanceLimited grants plus free financial counseling. · status changes often — check the fund’s site
  • Family ReachHelp with everyday living costs (rent, transport, food) during treatment. · status changes often — check the fund’s site
  • NeedyMedsSearchable directory of drug patient-assistance and discount programs. · status changes often — check the fund’s site
What you’ll typically need to apply
  • Your diagnosis and, if you have it, the specific drug/treatment name (from your care team).
  • Insurance details — your member ID card, or a note that you're uninsured (some funds require active insurance, some don't).
  • Proof of income and household size (recent pay stubs, a tax return, or a benefits letter) — most funds are income-based.
  • Your prescriber's contact information; some programs need the clinic to submit part of the application.
  • Apply early and re-check: funds open and close as money is available, so a closed fund may reopen.

General guidance — each program sets its own eligibility. Confirm requirements on the program’s site.

Second opinions

Caregiver support

We list only non-profit and government resources — never product sellers — and take no affiliate fees. If a link is broken or a resource doesn't meet that bar, tell us.

Heading to an appointment? Get a printable one-page summary — studied compounds, open trials, interactions, and questions to ask.
Bring this to your appointment →