Research Radartracking 1,762 published studies · 471 human · 11 safety signals · 58 clinical trials · 44 cancer pages · updated Sep 2026Open the Research Map →

Pancreatic Cancer

Auto-discovered from research; not yet curated.

Auto-added · review pending
Educational only: This page is not medical advice. Coordinate decisions with your oncology team.

OncoForge editorial · How we review →

AI extractedhuman reviewedsources checkedretractions suppressed

Evidence at a glanceHuman trial / meta-analysisMixed results⚠ Studies disagree
48 published studies that name Pancreatic Cancer3 human studies approved & graded (trial, observational, or meta-analysis)271 human clinical studies in the Pancreatic Cancer corpus1724 source documents in the Pancreatic Cancer corpus
Why this grade?

Human trial / meta-analysisIncludes human trial or meta-analysis evidence.

Computed deterministically from the studies’ types and reported outcomes — not written by AI, and not a claim that anything works.

What the guidelines say

NCI PDQESMONCCNASCO

We link the authoritative guidelines rather than reproduce them. Below, the treatments on this page are split into standard care, guideline or regulatory options, supportive care, and studied but not standard so established care is not mixed with experimental or supportive items.

Guideline / FDA options - context-specific
  • gemcitabine
Studied, not standard - investigational
  • Fuzuloparib
  • relacorilant

Read the guidelines

Cancer-specific deep links aren’t curated yet — these search the authoritative sources for Pancreatic Cancer.

Treatment map: Pancreatic Cancer

Open as a full page →

Standard care plus every compound studied in the literature (each cited) and graded by evidence, organized by clinical readiness. A category, not a verdict that anything works — confirm anything here with your oncology team.

3
Interventions
0
Standard of care
0
Tested in people
2
Lab / animal
0
Named in lit.
2
Classes
Standard of care (0) Guideline option (1) Tested in people (0) Lab / animal only (2) Named in the literature (0)
Clinical evidence
Preclinical evidence
Standard of care
Guideline option
Tested in people
Lab / animal only
Named in the literature
Chemotherapy
1
Targeted therapy
2

Columns group into clinical evidence (used in, or tested on, people) and preclinical evidence (lab/animal, or only named in the literature). Cell = number of interventions; a dashed cell means none recorded there.

Established care — detail (1)
Chemotherapy
gemcitabine
FDA-approved for this cancer.
Guideline option
Investigational & adjunct compounds — detail (2)

"Tested in people" rows show the highest trial phase found in that compound's cited human studies (Phase I–IV; "phase not reported" = a human study with no phase tag). "Studied" = named in the cited literature for this cancer. "FDA ✓" = FDA-approved for this cancer; "off-label" = an FDA-approved drug used outside its approved indications (per openFDA). Not a claim that anything works.

Reported figures

Get cited updates on Pancreatic Cancer
A monthly email when the research changes — $10/mo. Manage follows
Follow Pancreatic Cancer

What supports this page

The kinds of sources behind this page, strongest at the top. Faint rungs show what is not here yet.

Guideline
29
Meta-analysis
212
Systematic review
37
Randomized trial
0
Clinical trial
20
Observational
4
Case report
47
Review
1369
Preclinical
0
Other
6

Living document — last change June 16, 2026: New cancer type added.

Overview

Pancreatic Cancer is tracked here from the published studies that mention it. This page shows the research evidence collected so far — it is not a curated clinical overview.

Pooled evidence across studies

PubMed
  • Pancreatic cancer risk: RR 1.16 (0.93–1.29 across studies) · red meat
    4 studies · 75% agree · moderate22240790

Compounds compared by evidence

PubMed

How to read this: Ranked by the strength and volume of the evidence — NOT by how well a treatment works. A higher rank means a compound has been studied more, or in stronger study designs (e.g. randomized trials over lab studies), not that it produces better outcomes. The effect column shows the largest pooled figure reported, not a head-to-head comparison.

#CompoundEvidence strengthStudiesLargest pooled effect
1Fuzuloparib OtherInsufficient evidence1
2Relacorilant OtherInsufficient evidence1

Medicines & supplements studied for Pancreatic Cancer

PubMedFDAClinicalTrials.gov

Every drug, supplement, and other agent the published studies cover for Pancreatic Cancer, ranked by how strong the evidence is — what studies report, not a recommendation. Tap any to see its full profile.

Medicines · 3

GemcitabineAnimal onlyMixed results1 animal

Animal studies only — no human data.

Most authoritative study: Combining sonodynamic therapy with chemoradiation for the treatment of pancreatic cancer

No human studies yet · No numeric effect sizes reported · Based on a single study.
ChemotherapyFDA approved1 studyFull profile →
FuzuloparibInsufficient evidenceReported positive

No primary experimental studies yet.

Most authoritative study: Fuzuloparib: First Approval

No human studies yet · No numeric effect sizes reported · Based on a single study.
Targeted therapy1 studyFull profile →
RelacorilantInsufficient evidenceReported positive

No primary experimental studies yet.

Most authoritative study: Relacorilant: First Approval

No human studies yet · No numeric effect sizes reported · Based on a single study.
Targeted therapyFDA off-label1 studyFull profile →

What recent studies report in Pancreatic Cancer

These are reviewed studies whose abstracts concern Pancreatic Cancer. Each describes only what that study reported. This is not a claim by OncoForge that any compound helps or harms Pancreatic Cancer. Most are early lab, animal, or small human studies, and findings often conflict.

48 studies3 human4 animal1 lab⚠ Conflicting evidenceMechanism (18)Supportive care (4)Trial (2)Formulation (1)

Tracking 48 published studies of Pancreatic Cancer: 3 in humans, 4 in animals, 1 in the lab, 40 reviews/other.

Reported direction across studies: 18 positive, 10 mixed, 1 negative, 19 inconclusive.

Findings conflict — both supportive and negative/mixed results exist (see below). Human evidence is limited.

These counts summarize what the studies reported; they are not a measure of whether anything works for Pancreatic Cancer.

Compounds with studies mentioning Pancreatic Cancer

Relacorilant (1)Gemcitabine (1)Fuzuloparib (1)
ReviewReported positiveLimited evidenceTier 4 · clinical

Relacorilant: First Approval

Drugs · Jun 2026 · regulatory approval summary

Relacorilantepithelial ovarian cancerfallopian tube cancerprimary peritoneal cancerpancreatic cancerprostate cancer

Relacorilant is a non-steroidal, selective glucocorticoid receptor antagonist being developed for several solid tumours and Cushing syndrome. The article reports that relacorilant received its first approval in the USA on 25 March 2026 for use in combination with nab-paclitaxel for adults with platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer after 1-3 prior systemic regimens (at least one including bevacizumab). The article summarizes development milestones leading to this approval.

Studied with: nab-paclitaxel.

Key findings
  • Relacorilant is a non-steroidal, selective glucocorticoid receptor II antagonist developed by Corcept Therapeutics.
  • Relacorilant received first approval in the USA on 25 March 2026.
  • Approval is for use in combination with nab-paclitaxel for adults with platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer who have received 1-3 prior systemic treatment regimens, at least one of which included bevacizumab.
  • Relacorilant is being developed for various solid tumours including ovarian, fallopian tube, peritoneal, pancreatic and prostate cancers, as well as for Cushing syndrome.
  • The article summarizes milestones in the development of relacorilant leading to this approval.
Limitations: Abstract provides no efficacy or safety outcome data or numeric results from trials.; No trial design, sample size, or methods are reported in the abstract.; This is an approval/summary article, not primary trial data.; Geographic scope limited to a USA approval; supporting evidence is not detailed in the abstract..

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed · Jul 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed

Animal studyReported positivePreclinical onlyTier 2 · animal

KRAShing pancreatic cancer before takeoff

Science (New York, N.Y.) · Mar 2026

pancreatic cancer

The authors report that drugs which inhibit KRAS signaling delayed the development of pancreatic cancer in mice. The abstract does not specify which drugs, doses, timing, sample size, or statistical measures were used. This is an animal study showing a preclinical anticancer effect of KRAS-pathway inhibition.

Key findings
  • In mice, drugs that inhibit KRAS signaling delayed the development of pancreatic cancer.
Limitations: Study was performed in mice (animal model) and results may not translate to humans.; Abstract provides no details on which specific drugs were used, doses, timing, sample sizes, control groups, or statistical significance.; No quantitative results or methodology are reported in the abstract..

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed · Jun 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed

OtherMechanismReported negativePreclinical onlyTier 1 · lab

Adipose whispers to mast cells for accelerating immune evasion in pancreatic cancer

Cell metabolism · Dec 2025

pancreatic cancer

This study examined mechanisms linking obesity to pancreatic cancer progression. It reports that extracellular vesicles from visceral adipose tissue reprogram immune cells via a cathepsin A–pseudouridine–mast cell axis. The authors conclude this pathway promotes immune evasion and resistance to checkpoint blockade therapy in pancreatic cancer.

Key findings
  • Extracellular vesicles from visceral adipose tissue reprogram immune cells.
  • This reprogramming occurs through a cathepsin A–pseudouridine–mast cell axis.
  • The described mechanism provides a way obesity can drive immune evasion and resistance to checkpoint blockade therapy in pancreatic cancer.
Limitations: Abstract does not state the experimental model(s) used (cells, animals, or human tissue) or sample sizes.; No quantitative data, statistical results, or numeric effect sizes are reported in the abstract.; Abstract provides mechanistic insight but does not present clinical trial or patient outcome data to demonstrate relevance in humans..

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed · Sep 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed

ReviewInconclusiveLimited evidenceTier 4 · clinical

Pancreatic cancer in 2025: Have we found a solution?

World journal of gastroenterology · Nov 2025 · narrative review

pancreatic neoplasmspancreatic cancer

This is a narrative review summarizing recent progress in pancreatic cancer up to 2025. The authors discuss advances in prevention and early detection, better molecular understanding, more effective systemic therapies, improved quality of life and surgical outcomes, and the role of artificial intelligence.

Key findings
  • Pancreatic cancer continues to have a very poor prognosis due to late presentation, aggressive biology, and resistance to chemotherapy.
  • Areas of progress highlighted include prevention and early detection strategies.
  • The review notes refinements in molecular understanding of pancreatic cancer that may inform therapy.
  • Identifying more effective systemic therapies and improving quality of life and surgical outcomes are described as progress areas.
  • The authors emphasize the importance of technological advances, particularly artificial intelligence.
Limitations: Narrative review; no original experimental or clinical data are reported in the abstract.; Abstract provides no methods, selection criteria, or systematic search details.; No quantitative results or specific studies/metrics are reported in the abstract.; Broad scope limits detail on any single intervention, biomarker, or therapy..

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed · Jun 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed · Full text

Animal studyFormulationReported positivePreclinical onlyTier 2 · animal

Hypoxia-augmented chemotherapy potentiates imaging-guided combinatorial radionuclide-sonodynamic therapy for pancreatic cancer

Journal of nanobiotechnology · Jul 2025

pancreatic cancer

The authors developed a PLGA/polydopamine nanoparticle carrying manganese porphyrin and the hypoxia-activated prodrug tirapazamine, labeled with 131I for dual MRI/SPECT imaging. In preclinical experiments the platform generated ROS under ultrasound combined with 131I beta emissions, exacerbated tumor hypoxia to activate TPZ, and produced synergistic tumor-cell killing while inhibiting tumor stem cell formation. The nanoparticle showed good biocompatibility, stable radionuclide labeling, and enabled real-time imaging of its metabolism and therapeutic effect.

Studied with: 131I radionuclide therapy, sonodynamic therapy (ultrasound).

Key findings
  • MnTTP and tirapazamine (TPZ) were encapsulated in PLGA spheres and coated with polydopamine to allow labeling with 131I, creating a theranostic nanoplatform.
  • The nanoplatform demonstrated excellent biocompatibility, stable labeling efficiency, and dual-modal MRI/SPECT imaging capabilities.
  • Under ultrasound activation the nanoplatform generated ROS, and in combination with beta-rays emitted by 131I synergistically eradicated tumor cells and exacerbated tumor hypoxia.
  • TPZ was activated under hypoxic conditions to produce toxic free radicals, enabling synergistic radionuclide and sonodynamic therapy.
  • The combined approach effectively inhibited tumor stem cell formation and enhanced anti-tumor efficacy, with in vivo metabolism and therapeutic effect monitored by MRI/SPECT.
Limitations: Preclinical study reported in the abstract (in vivo models) with no human data.; Abstract does not report species, sample sizes, or quantitative effect sizes.; No details on controls, comparator groups, or statistical significance are provided in the abstract.; Safety, long-term outcomes, and translatability to humans are not addressed in the abstract..

Preclinical study of a theranostic nanoparticle combining radionuclide and sonodynamic approaches with a hypoxia-activated prodrug for pancreatic cancer.

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed · Sep 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed · Full text

ReviewInconclusiveLimited evidenceTier 4 · clinical

ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline Express Update on the management of metastatic pancreatic cancer

ESMO open · Apr 2025 · ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline Express Update

metastatic pancreatic cancer

This is an ESMO clinical practice guideline express update addressing recent developments in managing metastatic pancreatic cancer. The update was issued following the approval of first-line nanoliposomal irinotecan (NALIRIFOX) and provides updated first- and second-line treatment recommendations and an updated management algorithm.

Key findings
  • This ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline Express Update addresses developments in the management of metastatic pancreatic cancer.
  • It has been issued following the approval of first-line nanoliposomal irinotecan (NALIRIFOX regimen).
  • Updated first- and second-line treatment recommendations are provided.
  • An updated management algorithm for metastatic pancreatic cancer is also included.
Limitations: Abstract-only summary of a guideline; no methodological details or evidence tables are provided in the abstract.; No primary patient-level data, sample sizes, or outcome measures are reported in the abstract.; No information on funding, conflicts of interest, or the strength/grade of specific recommendations is provided in the abstract..

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed · Jul 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed · Full text

ReviewMechanismReported positiveLimited evidenceTier 3 · early human

The regulatory role of ZFAS1/miRNAs/mRNAs axis in cancer: a systematic review

Oncology research · Feb 2025 · Systematic review with bioinformatic analyses (PRISMA-guided literature search and database analyses)

ovarian cancersarcomapancreatic cancer

This systematic review and bioinformatic analysis examined the relationships among the long noncoding RNA ZFAS1, microRNAs, and mRNAs in cancer. The authors report that ZFAS1 often acts as a sponge for multiple miRNAs, highlight a strong negative correlation with miR-150-5p, and find that higher ZFAS1 expression is associated with poorer overall survival in ovarian, sarcoma, and pancreatic cancers. They also identify involvement of signaling pathways including STAT3 and Wnt/β-catenin and roles in RNA binding and ribonucleoprotein formation.

Reported effect: correlation miR-150-5p vs ZFAS1 -0.346, p=3.27e-16

Key findings
  • ZFAS1 serves as a sponge for numerous miRNAs (ceRNA activity).
  • miR-150-5p is significantly correlated with ZFAS1 across multiple databases (p-value = 3.27e-16, R-value = -0.346).
  • Kaplan-Meier survival analysis indicated an association between ZFAS1 expression levels and worse overall prognosis in ovarian, sarcoma, and pancreatic cancers.
  • ZFAS1/miRNAs/mRNAs axis involves signaling pathways including STAT3, SKA1, LPAR1, and Wnt/β-catenin.
  • ZFAS1 is implicated in molecular processes such as RNA binding and ribonucleoprotein formation.
Limitations: This paper is a systematic review and bioinformatic analysis rather than primary experimental or clinical data.; Findings are largely observational and correlative; causality is not established.; No sample sizes or patient-level details are reported in the abstract for the survival analyses.; Potential heterogeneity and publication bias across the included studies are not detailed in the abstract.; No experimental validation of the bioinformatic predictions is reported in the abstract..

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed · Jun 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed · Full text

ReviewReported positiveModerate evidenceTier 4 · clinical

Recent advances in Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) therapy for glioblastoma

The oncologist · Feb 2025 · narrative review

glioblastomagrade 4 gliomapediatric central nervous system tumorsbrain metastaseslung cancerovarian cancerpancreatic cancergastric cancerhepatic cancer

This review summarizes Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields), a noninvasive device that delivers alternating electric fields to tumors. It reports mechanisms of action (mitotic disruption, DNA replication/DNA damage response effects, reduced motility, and immune enhancement), notes FDA approval for newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma, and describes clinical data showing efficacy across patient groups, a tolerable safety profile, and correlations between higher device usage/dose and longer survival. The review also highlights promising pilot studies combining TTFields with immunotherapy and radiotherapy and ongoing studies in pediatric patients and other solid tumors.

Studied with: immunotherapy, radiotherapy.

Key findings
  • TTFields is a locoregional, noninvasive, portable device that delivers alternating electric fields to tumors through arrays placed on the skin.
  • Based on global pivotal randomized phase III clinical studies, TTFields therapy (Optune Gio) is FDA-approved for newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma and CE-marked for grade 4 glioma.
  • Multimodal mechanisms include disruption of cancer cell mitosis, inhibition of DNA replication and damage response, interference with cell motility, and enhancement of systemic adaptive immunity.
  • Clinical data show efficacy in a broad range of patients with a tolerable safety profile, including high-risk subpopulations.
  • New analyses confirmed that overall and progression-free survival positively correlated with increased device usage and dose of TTFields at the tumor site.
  • Pilot/early phase clinical studies of TTFields with immunotherapy and with radiotherapy in newly diagnosed GBM have shown promise; new pivotal studies are planned.
  • Recent and ongoing studies are evaluating TTFields in pediatric care, other CNS tumors, brain metastases, and several advanced-stage solid tumors (lung, ovarian, pancreatic, gastric, hepatic).
Limitations: This article is a narrative review rather than original research; the abstract does not present new primary numeric results.; Abstract provides no numeric effect sizes, confidence intervals, p-values, or sample sizes for the studies discussed.; Claims about broader tumor types, pediatric use, and combinations are based on pilot/early-phase studies and ongoing research and thus remain preliminary.; Potential for selection or publication bias in the reviewed literature is not addressed in the abstract.; Funding sources and potential conflicts of interest are not reported in the abstract..

The review focuses on TTFields therapy's mechanisms, clinical efficacy/safety data in glioblastoma, and exploratory uses in other CNS and solid tumors.

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed · Jul 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed · Full text

ReviewMechanismInconclusiveLimited evidenceTier 4 · clinical

The role of biomarkers in the early detection of pancreatic cancer

Familial cancer · Aug 2024 · review

pancreatic cancer

This narrative review discusses current pancreatic surveillance and the need for better biomarkers to expand early detection beyond high-risk groups. It notes that current surveillance uses annual endoscopic ultrasound and MRI/MRCP for people with familial/genetic risk, and that accurate, inexpensive, safe biomarkers remain elusive. The authors highlight newer approaches such as personalized gene tests and artificial intelligence to integrate complex biomarker data as promising directions.

Key findings
  • Pancreatic surveillance can detect early-stage pancreatic cancer and achieve long-term survival in some cases.
  • Current surveillance involves annual endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and MRI/MRCP and is recommended only for individuals who meet familial/genetic risk criteria.
  • More accurate, inexpensive, and safe biomarkers are needed to improve early detection and expand access, but have so far been elusive.
  • Newer approaches — gene tests to personalize biomarker interpretation and artificial intelligence to integrate complex biomarker data — offer promise for future clinically useful biomarkers.
Limitations: This is a narrative review rather than original primary data from a clinical study.; No new validated biomarkers or quantitative diagnostic performance metrics are reported in the abstract.; Recommendations are general and do not provide prospectively validated protocols for broader population screening.; Abstract does not report study methods, search strategy, or systematic review/meta-analysis methods..

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed · Jun 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed · Full text

ReviewReported positiveLimited evidenceTier 4 · clinical

Radiochemotherapy in Pancreatic Cancer

Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · Jun 2024

pancreatic cancer

This is a narrative review about the role of radiotherapy combined with systemic therapy in pancreatic cancer. The authors note very poor 5-year survival (under 10%), describe current standards (surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy for resectable disease; chemotherapy for unresectable/metastatic disease), and argue that radiotherapy alongside chemotherapy may improve outcomes though radiotherapy has no established role.

Studied with: chemotherapy, systemic treatment.

Key findings
  • Five-year survival rates for pancreatic cancer do not exceed 10%.
  • For resectable pancreatic cancer the mainstay of treatment is surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy.
  • For unresectable and metastatic pancreatic cancers, chemotherapy remains the primary method of treatment.
  • Radiotherapy has been combined with systemic treatment for about thirty years, but unlike chemotherapy it has no established place in the treatment of pancreatic cancer.
  • The paper presents radiotherapy as a potentially valuable method that can improve outcomes when used alongside chemotherapy.
Limitations: Narrative review — no original clinical trial data are presented in the abstract.; Abstract provides no quantitative results or new empirical evidence from this study.; Statement that radiotherapy may improve outcomes is not supported by numeric outcomes or trial data in the abstract.; Scope and methodology of the review (search strategy, inclusion criteria) are not described in the abstract..

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed · Jun 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed · Full text

ReviewMechanismInconclusiveLimited evidenceTier 4 · clinical

Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Where Are We?

Oncology reviews · Jan 2024

metastatic pancreatic cancer

This is a narrative review summarizing the molecular landscape and current treatment options for metastatic pancreatic cancer. The authors note that most patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage, options for curative surgery are usually not available, and standard management includes systemic therapy, sometimes radiotherapy, and more recently molecular targeted therapies. The abstract states that targeted therapies may positively impact cancer control and quality of life. The review does not present primary quantitative data in the abstract.

Key findings
  • Pancreatic cancer is aggressive with a poor prognosis and low overall survival.
  • Most patients present with non-specific symptoms and are diagnosed at advanced stages when curative surgery is generally not an option.
  • Treatment of metastatic disease includes systemic therapy and, in some cases, radiotherapy.
  • Molecular targeted therapies have more recently been introduced and can positively impact cancer control and quality of life, according to the authors.
  • The review provides an overview of the molecular landscape and current treatment options based on recent literature.
Limitations: Narrative review without primary data reported in the abstract.; Abstract does not state that the review is systematic or describe search/methods, so selection bias is possible.; No quantitative outcomes or new clinical trial results are provided in the abstract..

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed · Sep 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed · Full text

ReviewMechanismReported positivePreclinical onlyTier 1 · lab

Circular RNAs in pancreatic cancer progression

Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry · Jan 2024 · Review

pancreatic cancer

This review summarizes evidence that circular RNAs (circRNAs) are abnormally expressed in tumors and play roles in pancreatic cancer progression. It highlights that circRNAs can be packaged in exosomes and transferred among pancreatic cancer cells, influencing malignancy, and suggests that understanding these mechanisms could aid earlier detection and inform future therapeutic strategies.

Key findings
  • circRNAs are abnormally expressed in diverse tumors, including pancreatic cancer.
  • circRNAs affect tumorigenesis and progression.
  • circRNAs enriched in exosomes can be transferred among pancreatic cancer cells to modulate malignancy.
  • Characterizing regulatory mechanisms involving circRNAs may enable earlier detection and potential development of therapeutic strategies.
Limitations: Review article summarizing existing studies rather than presenting new experimental data.; Abstract provides no quantitative results, patient data, or methods.; Does not establish causal effects in human patients; translational implications are speculative..

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed · Sep 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed

Browse all studies mentioning Pancreatic Cancer

Where the evidence is

What has been studied, and how strong it is, by topic. A dashed cell means no studies were found for that combination — a gap, not evidence of no effect. Open a row to see its studies.

CompoundHuman evidenceMechanismSafetyTrial
Fuzuloparib11
Gemcitabine1
Relacorilant1

Study mix

48 published studies by what they were done in. Lab and animal findings often do not carry over to people.

3 Human4 Animal1 Lab40 Review/other
Reported directionReported positive18Mixed results10Reported negative1Inconclusive19

Compounds with reported-positive results in Pancreatic Cancer

Where at least one study reported a positive result, shown with the full picture, not just the wins. Positive results are more likely to be published, and most of these are early lab or animal studies that may not translate to people. This reports what studies found, not what works.

Preclinical only: lab / animal (2)
Relacorilant1 positive
Limitations: Abstract provides no efficacy or safety outcome data or numeric results from trials.; No trial design, sample size, or methods are reported in the abstract.; This is an approval/summary article, not primary trial data.; Geographic scope limited to a USA approval; supporting evidence is not detailed in the abstract..
Cited positive studies (1)
Fuzuloparib1 positive
Limitations: Review article; no original study data in the abstract.; No efficacy or safety results are reported in the abstract.; No comparator, sample size, or quantitative outcomes are provided..
Cited positive studies (1)

Evidence at a glance: compounds studied in Pancreatic Cancer

A deterministic grade of what published studies report for each: strength of evidence, the reported direction, and the largest credible effect, strongest-evidence first. This summarizes findings; it is not a claim that anything works.

GemcitabineAnimal onlyMixed results1 animal

Animal studies only — no human data.

Most authoritative study: Combining sonodynamic therapy with chemoradiation for the treatment of pancreatic cancer

No human studies yet · No numeric effect sizes reported · Based on a single study.
FuzuloparibInsufficient evidenceReported positive

No primary experimental studies yet.

Most authoritative study: Fuzuloparib: First Approval

No human studies yet · No numeric effect sizes reported · Based on a single study.
RelacorilantInsufficient evidenceReported positive

No primary experimental studies yet.

Most authoritative study: Relacorilant: First Approval

No human studies yet · No numeric effect sizes reported · Based on a single study.

What the research shows for Pancreatic Cancer

A plain-language summary of the reviewed studies OncoForge tracks for Pancreatic Cancer. It reports what those studies described, not a claim that any compound or therapy helps or harms Pancreatic Cancer. Most of this evidence is early, and findings often conflict.

  • Most of the supplied articles are narrative reviews summarizing recent progress and challenges in pancreatic cancer; they emphasize that 5-year survival remains very poor (under 10%) and that most evidence is still evolving.
  • Several reviews focus on hereditary pancreatic cancer, outlining syndromes linked to increased risk and current recommendations for genetic testing and surveillance; surveillance programs may have potential to improve outcomes but supporting data are limited.
  • Multiple reviews highlight a need for better biomarkers and earlier detection strategies; current high-risk surveillance typically uses endoscopic ultrasound and MRI/MRCP and is largely applied to selected high-risk groups.
  • Immunotherapy reviews report mixed results and substantial challenges specific to pancreatic cancer (an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, poor T cell infiltration, low mutational burden), and they describe emerging but not definitive strategies.
  • At least one review discusses radiotherapy combined with systemic therapy and summarizes its role in selected settings, but overall outcomes remain poor and evidence is heterogeneous.

Compounds studied in Pancreatic Cancer

Fuzuloparib1 study
The provided review describes fuzuloparib as an oral PARP inhibitor approved in China for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer in patients with germline BRCA mutations; the set of studies supplied does not report clinical data for fuzuloparib in pancreatic cancer (limitation: evidence is from other cancers and review-level).

Supportive & alternative options discussed

  • Ketogenic / metabolic therapy: Also discussed as a supportive or complementary dietary approach in pancreatic cancer care, typically based on limited or preliminary evidence rather than definitive clinical trials.
  • Acupuncture: Also discussed as a supportive option for symptom control (e.g., pain, nausea) in pancreatic cancer care in some reports, usually based on symptomatic management rather than disease-modifying evidence.
  • Exercise / prehabilitation: Also discussed as a supportive measure to help maintain function, quality of life, and tolerance of therapy in people with pancreatic cancer.
  • Mind–body (MBSR / CBT): Also discussed as a complementary approach to help with coping, stress reduction, and quality of life during pancreatic cancer treatment.
  • Mistletoe (VAE): Also mentioned in some contexts as an alternative or complementary therapy discussed for supportive care in pancreatic cancer, though evidence is limited and mixed.

What we don’t know yet

  • Whether fuzuloparib or other PARP inhibitors have clinical activity in pancreatic cancer — the provided studies do not include pancreatic-specific clinical trials of fuzuloparib.
  • Which biomarkers or surveillance strategies can reliably detect pancreatic cancer early in average-risk populations — current evidence supports surveillance mainly in high-risk groups.
  • Which immunotherapy approaches can overcome the pancreatic tumor microenvironment to produce meaningful clinical benefit — existing reviews note challenges and preliminary results but no clear solutions.
  • What high-quality randomized clinical trial data support changing standard care in most settings described by these reviews — many conclusions are based on narrative summaries or limited studies.
  • Long-term outcomes, optimal dosing, safety, and patient selection for many repurposed or complementary interventions discussed in the literature remain undefined.
Overall, the evidence in these studies is largely review-level and early-stage, with limited pancreatic-specific clinical trial data and many unanswered questions requiring prospective, high-quality research.

Clinical trials in Pancreatic Cancer

65 ongoing · 68 completed · tracked from ClinicalTrials.gov. Recruiting is not the same as proven, and completed is not the same as positive — read the results. Not a recommendation.

Completed
34 stopped (terminated / withdrawn / suspended)

Search all trials on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Getting care & support

Nonprofit / Gov

Practical, vetted help for Pancreatic Cancer — advocacy, paying for treatment, second opinions, and caregivers.

If you’re struggling emotionally, you don’t have to wait.

Advocacy & community

No dedicated organization for this specific cancer is curated yet — these general organizations can help in the meantime.

Financial help

  • PAN FoundationCopay assistance funds by diagnosis (funds open and close as money allows). · status changes often — check the fund’s site
  • HealthWell FoundationCopay and premium assistance funds by disease. · status changes often — check the fund’s site
  • CancerCare — financial assistanceLimited grants plus free financial counseling. · status changes often — check the fund’s site
  • Family ReachHelp with everyday living costs (rent, transport, food) during treatment. · status changes often — check the fund’s site
  • NeedyMedsSearchable directory of drug patient-assistance and discount programs. · status changes often — check the fund’s site
What you’ll typically need to apply
  • Your diagnosis and, if you have it, the specific drug/treatment name (from your care team).
  • Insurance details — your member ID card, or a note that you're uninsured (some funds require active insurance, some don't).
  • Proof of income and household size (recent pay stubs, a tax return, or a benefits letter) — most funds are income-based.
  • Your prescriber's contact information; some programs need the clinic to submit part of the application.
  • Apply early and re-check: funds open and close as money is available, so a closed fund may reopen.

General guidance — each program sets its own eligibility. Confirm requirements on the program’s site.

Help paying for the medicines on this page

Second opinions

Caregiver support

We list only non-profit and government resources — never product sellers — and take no affiliate fees. If a link is broken or a resource doesn't meet that bar, tell us.

Heading to an appointment? Get a printable one-page summary — studied compounds, open trials, interactions, and questions to ask.
Bring this to your appointment →