Research Radartracking 72 published studies · 21 human · 14 clinical trials · 14 cancer pages · updated Jun 2026Open the Research Map →

Endometrial Cancer

Auto-discovered from research; not yet curated.

Auto-added · review pending
Educational only: This page is not medical advice. Coordinate decisions with your oncology team.

OncoForge editorial · How we review →

AI extractedhuman reviewedsources checkedretractions suppressed

Evidence at a glanceHuman trial / meta-analysisMixed results⚠ Studies disagree
4 published studies that name Endometrial Cancer1 human studies (trial, observational, or meta-analysis)737 source documents in the Endometrial Cancer corpus
Why this grade?

Human trial / meta-analysisIncludes human trial or meta-analysis evidence.

Computed deterministically from the studies’ types and reported outcomes — not written by AI, and not a claim that anything works.

Treatment map: Endometrial Cancer

Open as a full page →

Standard care plus every compound studied in the literature (each cited) and graded by evidence, organized by clinical readiness. A category, not a verdict that anything works — confirm anything here with your oncology team.

1
Interventions
0
Standard of care
0
Tested in people
1
Lab / animal
0
Named in lit.
1
Classes
Standard of care (0) Guideline option (0) Tested in people (0) Lab / animal only (1) Named in the literature (0)
Investigational & adjunct compounds — detail (1)
Lab / animal only

"Tested in people" rows show the highest trial phase found in that compound's cited human studies (Phase I–IV; "phase not reported" = a human study with no phase tag). "Studied" = named in the cited literature for this cancer. "FDA ✓" = FDA-approved for this cancer; "off-label" = an FDA-approved drug used outside its approved indications (per openFDA). Not a claim that anything works.

Reported figures

Living document — last change June 9, 2026: New cancer type added.

Overview

Endometrial Cancer is tracked here from the published studies that mention it. This page shows the research evidence collected so far — it is not a curated clinical overview.

What supports this page

The kinds of sources behind this page, strongest at the top. Faint rungs show what is not here yet.

Guideline
28
Meta-analysis
156
Systematic review
22
Randomized trial
0
Clinical trial
2
Observational
1
Case report
14
Review
514
Preclinical
0
Other
0

Evidence on specific compounds

How the published studies grade individual drugs, supplements, and other agents in Endometrial Cancer — each rated by how strong the evidence is, not a recommendation.

What recent studies report in Endometrial Cancer

These are reviewed studies whose abstracts concern Endometrial Cancer. Each describes only what that study reported. This is not a claim by OncoForge that any compound helps or harms Endometrial Cancer. Most are early lab, animal, or small human studies, and findings often conflict.

4 studies1 human⚠ Conflicting evidenceMechanism (2)Trial (1)

Tracking 4 published studies of Endometrial Cancer: 1 in humans, 3 reviews/other.

Reported direction across studies: 1 positive, 2 mixed, 1 inconclusive.

Findings conflict — both supportive and negative/mixed results exist (see below). Human evidence is limited.

These counts summarize what the studies reported; they are not a measure of whether anything works for Endometrial Cancer.

Compounds with studies mentioning Endometrial Cancer

Carboplatin (1)
ReviewMechanismInconclusiveLimited evidenceTier 4 · clinical

Carcinosarcoma of the Endometrium-Pathology, Molecular Landscape and Novel Therapeutic Approaches

Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · Jun 2025 · review

endometrial carcinosarcomaendometrial cancercarcinosarcoma of the endometrium

This is a narrative review of endometrial carcinosarcoma (ECS), a rare, aggressive biphasic endometrial cancer. The authors summarize epidemiology, pathology including that ECS arises from epithelial components undergoing epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, prognosis, molecular characteristics, and current and novel therapeutic approaches, noting a poor prognosis and limited high-quality trial evidence.

Reported effects: proportion_diagnosed_early 50% · proportion_with_metastatic_lymph_nodes 33% · +1 more

Key findings
  • ECS is a rare, aggressive biphasic metaplastic carcinoma with a monoclonal origin composed of epithelial and mesenchymal components.
  • The tumor originates from epithelial components that undergo epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition.
  • Approximately half of patients are diagnosed at early stage and half at advanced stage.
  • More than one-third of women present with metastatic lymph nodes and approximately 10% have distant metastases.
  • ECS has the worst prognosis among endometrial cancers compared with other high-grade endometrial carcinomas.
  • Surgical resection with adjuvant therapy remains the standard of care in most cases.
  • Rarity of ECS limits prospective clinical trials and the development of specific management guidelines.
  • The review discusses molecular characteristics and new treatment regimens for primary (early and advanced) and recurrent ECS.
Limitations: This article is a review and presents no new primary data.; The rarity of ECS limits the ability to conduct prospective clinical trials and to establish optimal treatment regimens (stated in abstract).; No specific treatment guidelines exist for ECS, reflecting limited high-quality evidence (stated in abstract)..

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed · Jun 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed · Full text

Meta-analysisTrialReported positiveModerate evidenceTier 4 · clinicaln = 2456

Incorporation of anti-PD1 or anti PD-L1 agents to platinum-based chemotherapy for the primary treatment of advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. A meta-analysis

Cancer treatment reviews · Apr 2024 · meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (first-line ICI + platinum-based chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone)

advanced endometrial cancerrecurrent endometrial cancerendometrial carcinosarcoma

This meta-analysis pooled five randomized trials (2456 patients) comparing addition of anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 agents to standard platinum-based chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. Adding immune checkpoint inhibitors improved progression-free survival overall and especially in tumors with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR); in mismatch repair–proficient (pMMR) tumors a statistically significant PFS benefit was reported only with anti-PD-1 agents, not anti-PD-L1 agents. The analysis reports PFS outcomes; the impact on overall survival remains to be clarified.

Reported effects: included patients 2456, n=2456 · pooled HR overall 0.63 [0.52–0.76], p <.001, n=2456 · +5 more

Studied with: carboplatin-paclitaxel chemotherapy.

Key findings
  • Five randomized trials comprising 2456 patients (1308 received ICIs + chemotherapy and 1148 chemotherapy alone) were included.
  • Addition of ICIs to chemotherapy improved PFS in the overall population (pooled HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.52–0.76; P < .001).
  • In the dMMR subgroup the pooled PFS benefit was larger (pooled HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.27–0.44; P < .001).
  • In dMMR tumors benefit was seen with both PD-L1 and PD-1 inhibitors (pooled HRs 0.39, 95% CI 0.28–0.55 and 0.34, 95% CI 0.27–0.44, respectively; both P < .001).
  • In pMMR patients a statistically significant PFS benefit was observed only with anti-PD-1 agents (anti-PD-1: HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.46–0.90, P = .010) but not with anti-PD-L1 agents (anti-PD-L1: HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.73–1.03, P = .104).
Limitations: Meta-analysis focused on progression-free survival (PFS); impact on overall survival (OS) is not reported and remains uncertain.; Subgroup analyses by dMMR/pMMR and by drug class (anti-PD-1 vs anti-PD-L1) are based on pooled trial-level data and may be limited by heterogeneity and lack of patient-level data.; Three of five trials included endometrial carcinosarcoma, which may affect generalizability to typical endometrial carcinoma populations.; The abstract does not report safety/toxicity or follow-up duration, limiting assessment of risks and long-term outcomes..

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed · Jun 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed

ReviewMechanismMixed resultsLimited evidenceTier 1 · lab

Nucleobindin-2/Nesfatin-1-A New Cancer Related Molecule?

International journal of molecular sciences · Aug 2021 · review

breast cancercolon cancerprostate cancerendometrial cancerthyroid cancerbladder cancerglioblastomaadrenocortical carcinomaovarian epithelial carcinoma

This review discusses nucleobindin-2/nesfatin-1 (NUCB2/NESF-1) as a cancer-related molecule. It summarizes reports that higher expression is linked with poorer outcomes and with increased cancer cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in several cancers, while other reports suggest it may inhibit growth in some cancer cell types. The article does not present new experimental data.

Key findings
  • High NUCB2/NESF-1 expression has been associated with poor outcomes in several cancers.
  • Reported effects include increased cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in breast, colon, prostate, endometrial, thyroid, and bladder cancers, and glioblastoma.
  • The review also notes conflicting findings where nesfatin-1 inhibited proliferation in human adrenocortical carcinoma and ovarian epithelial carcinoma cells.
  • The authors propose NUCB2/NESF-1 as a prognostic and predictive marker in cancers.
Limitations: Review article; no original experimental or clinical data.; The abstract summarizes heterogeneous prior studies with conflicting findings.; No quantitative effect estimates are reported in the abstract.; No details on study quality, sample sizes, or methods of the cited studies are provided..

This is a review of a molecule reported to be associated with cancer progression and prognosis, not a primary intervention study.

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed · Jun 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed · Full text

ReviewMixed resultsLimited evidenceTier 4 · clinical

Uterine carcinosarcoma: Contemporary clinical summary, molecular updates, and future research opportunity

Gynecologic oncology · Feb 2021 · contemporary clinical summary and molecular review

Carboplatinuterine carcinosarcomaendometrial cancer

This review summarizes recent clinical and molecular findings about uterine carcinosarcoma, a rare aggressive endometrial cancer. It reports that multimodal treatment is commonly used, and that carboplatin/paclitaxel adjuvant chemotherapy improved progression-free survival compared with ifosfamide/paclitaxel in the GOG-261 trial. The review also highlights epithelial-mesenchymal transition as an important process in the tumor’s development and discusses common gene mutations seen in these tumors.

Reported effects: annual percent change 1.7% [1.2–2.2] · median survival 2 mo · +6 more

Studied with: ifosfamide/paclitaxel.

Key findings
  • Uterine carcinosarcoma incidence has gradually increased over time.
  • Median survival remains less than two years and 5-year overall survival has not changed much over decades.
  • Carboplatin/paclitaxel adjuvant chemotherapy improved progression-free survival compared with ifosfamide/paclitaxel, particularly in stages III-IV disease.
  • Epithelial-mesenchymal transition appears to play a pivotal role in sarcomatous dedifferentiation.
  • Common somatic mutations include TP53, PIK3CA, FBXW7, PTEN, and ARID1A.
Limitations: This is a narrative review, not a new experimental study.; Quantitative results are summarized from prior studies rather than generated directly here.; No detailed methods, patient-level data, or full trial design are provided in the abstract.; Some statements are descriptive and not tied to a single controlled comparison..

Useful overview of clinical outcomes and molecular features in uterine carcinosarcoma, including one chemotherapy comparison and discussion of EMT as a potential target.

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed · Jun 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed

Browse all studies mentioning Endometrial Cancer

Study mix

4 published studies by what they were done in. Lab and animal findings often do not carry over to people.

1 Human3 Review/other
Reported directionReported positive1Mixed results2Inconclusive1

Evidence at a glance: compounds studied in Endometrial Cancer

A deterministic grade of what published studies report for each: strength of evidence, the reported direction, and the largest credible effect, strongest-evidence first. This summarizes findings; it is not a claim that anything works.

CarboplatinInsufficient evidenceMixed results

No primary experimental studies yet.

Largest credible effect: annual percent change 1.7% [1.2–2.2] PMID 33183764 · response rates 5.5–37.5 across 4 studies

Most authoritative study: Uterine carcinosarcoma: Contemporary clinical summary, molecular updates, and future research opportunity

No human studies yet · Based on a single study.

Clinical trials in Endometrial Cancer

Loading current trials from ClinicalTrials.gov… Search ClinicalTrials.gov →

Heading to an appointment? Get a printable one-page summary — studied compounds, open trials, interactions, and questions to ask.
Bring this to your appointment →