Research Radartracking 209 published studies · 52 human · 18 clinical trials · 25 cancer pages · updated Jun 2026Open the Research Map →

Mesonephric Adenocarcinoma

Auto-discovered from research; not yet curated.

Auto-added · review pending
Educational only: This page is not medical advice. Coordinate decisions with your oncology team.

OncoForge editorial · How we review →

AI extractedhuman reviewedsources checkedretractions suppressed

Evidence at a glanceHuman · observationalMixed results⚠ Studies disagree
3 published studies that name Mesonephric Adenocarcinoma3 human studies approved & graded (trial, observational, or meta-analysis)5 human clinical studies in the Mesonephric Adenocarcinoma corpus174 source documents in the Mesonephric Adenocarcinoma corpus
Why this grade?

Human · observationalHuman observational evidence only — no trials.

Computed deterministically from the studies’ types and reported outcomes — not written by AI, and not a claim that anything works.

What the guidelines say

NCI PDQESMONCCNASCO

We link the authoritative guidelines rather than reproduce them. Below, the treatments on this page are split into standard care, guideline or regulatory options, supportive care, and studied but not standard so established care is not mixed with experimental or supportive items.

Read the guidelines

Cancer-specific deep links aren’t curated yet — these search the authoritative sources for Mesonephric Adenocarcinoma.

Reported figures

Get cited updates on Mesonephric Adenocarcinoma
A monthly email when the research changes — $10/mo. Manage follows
Follow Mesonephric Adenocarcinoma

What supports this page

The kinds of sources behind this page, strongest at the top. Faint rungs show what is not here yet.

Guideline
1
Meta-analysis
1
Systematic review
3
Randomized trial
0
Clinical trial
4
Observational
0
Case report
102
Review
62
Preclinical
0
Other
1

Living document — last change June 16, 2026: New cancer type added.

Overview

Mesonephric Adenocarcinoma is tracked here from the published studies that mention it. This page shows the research evidence collected so far — it is not a curated clinical overview.

What recent studies report in Mesonephric Adenocarcinoma

These are reviewed studies whose abstracts concern Mesonephric Adenocarcinoma. Each describes only what that study reported. This is not a claim by OncoForge that any compound helps or harms Mesonephric Adenocarcinoma. Most are early lab, animal, or small human studies, and findings often conflict.

3 studies3 human⚠ Conflicting evidenceMechanism (2)

Tracking 3 published studies of Mesonephric Adenocarcinoma: 3 in humans.

Reported direction across studies: 2 positive, 1 negative.

Findings conflict — both supportive and negative/mixed results exist (see below). Human evidence is limited.

These counts summarize what the studies reported; they are not a measure of whether anything works for Mesonephric Adenocarcinoma.

Human · observationalMechanismReported positiveLimited evidenceTier 3 · early humann = 48

Napsin-A Expression in Mesonephric and Mesonephric-like Adenocarcinomas: Implications for Distinction From Clear Cell Carcinoma

International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists · Nov 2025 · case series

mesonephric adenocarcinomamesonephric-like adenocarcinomaclear cell carcinomamesonephric carcinosarcoma

The authors performed Napsin-A immunohistochemistry on whole-slide sections from 48 mesonephric and mesonephric-like adenocarcinomas and carcinosarcomas. Napsin-A was positive in 17/48 cases (35.4%), with focal granular cytoplasmic staining in 1–40% of cells; positivity occurred in 13/32 MLAs, 2/13 MAs, and 2/3 carcinosarcomas. The study concludes that Napsin-A is expressed in a substantial subset of these tumors and that reliance on a single marker could lead to misclassification as clear cell carcinoma.

Reported effects: Napsin-A positive overall 35.4%, n=48 · Range of focal granular cytoplasmic expression · +3 more

Key findings
  • Napsin-A staining was positive in 17 of 48 cases (35.4%), with focal granular cytoplasmic expression ranging from 1% to 40%.
  • 13/32 (40.6%) mesonephric-like adenocarcinomas (MLAs) were Napsin-A positive.
  • 2/13 (15.4%) mesonephric adenocarcinomas (MAs) were Napsin-A positive.
  • 2/3 (66.7%) mesonephric or mesonephric-like carcinosarcomas were Napsin-A positive.
  • Because of morphologic and immunohistochemical overlap, Napsin-A expression in MA/MLA may contribute to misclassification as clear cell carcinoma.
Limitations: Observational pathology series without reported clinical outcome correlation; Relatively small overall sample size and very small subgroup sizes (e.g., n=3 carcinosarcomas); Findings are based solely on immunohistochemistry on tissue sections; no clinical or molecular correlation reported in the abstract.

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed · Jun 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed

Human · observationalMechanismReported positiveLimited evidenceTier 3 · early humann = 6

Mesonephric Adenocarcinoma and Mesonephric-like Adenocarcinoma of the Urinary Tract

Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · Jan 2023 · case series

mesonephric adenocarcinomamesonephric-like adenocarcinomaurinary tracturinary bladderperirenal regionureteruterine cervixovaryendometrium

This study reports a case series of six mesonephric (MA) or mesonephric-like (MLA) adenocarcinomas arising in the urinary tract and describes their morphology, immunophenotype, and limited molecular findings. All six tumors were Pax8-positive and showed a luminal pattern of CD10 staining (CD10 unavailable in one case); a KRAS G12C mutation was found in one case, and other tested hotspot mutations were absent. The authors propose classifying urinary-tract tumors with mesonephric remnants as MA and those associated with Müllerian-type precursors as MLA.

Reported effects: MA in urinary bladder cases 4, n=6 · MA in perirenal region cases 1, n=6 · +4 more

Key findings
  • Characterized 4 cases of MA in the urinary bladder (1 woman and 3 men), 1 case of MA in the perirenal region (woman), and 1 case of MLA in the ureter (woman).
  • All cases (6/6) were diffusely positive for Pax8.
  • All displayed a luminal pattern of CD10 staining, except case 4 for which CD10 immunostain was not available for review.
  • GATA3 expression was variable: focally positive in cases 1, 2, and 6; negative in case 3; diffusely positive in case 5.
  • TTF-1 was diffusely expressed in cases 1 and 3 and negative in cases 2, 5, and 6.
  • A KRAS G12C somatic mutation was detected in case 6; hotspot mutations in KRAS, NRAS, and PIK3CA were not present in other tested cases.
  • Authors conclude urinary-tract MAs and MLAs share morphology and immunophenotype with their counterparts in the female genital tract and propose a classification based on origin (mesonephric remnants/Wolffian vs Müllerian-type precursors).
Limitations: Very small number of cases (n=6).; Retrospective case series without systematic clinical outcome or follow-up data reported.; Molecular testing appears limited (hotspot testing reported) and not uniformly applied to all cases.; One case lacked CD10 immunostain availability, limiting uniform immunophenotypic assessment..

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed · Jun 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed

Human · observationalReported negativeModerate evidenceTier 3 · early humann = 99

Clinicopathologic Characteristics of Mesonephric Adenocarcinomas and Mesonephric-like Adenocarcinomas in the Gynecologic Tract: A Multi-institutional Study

The American journal of surgical pathology · Apr 2021 · multi-institutional case series

mesonephric adenocarcinoma (uterine cervix)mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma (endometrium)mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma (ovary)

This multi-institutional study reviewed 99 well-defined cases of mesonephric and mesonephric-like adenocarcinomas of the gynecologic tract and described clinicopathologic features. Most tumors presented at an advanced stage and over half developed recurrences, which were most often distant. Five-year disease-specific survival was 74% for cervical MA, 72% for endometrial MLA, and 71% for ovarian MLA.

Reported effects: advanced stage (II to IV) presentation, MA of the cervix 60%, n=25 · advanced stage (II to IV) presentation, MLA of the endometrium 58%, n=43 · +11 more

Key findings
  • Majority presented at advanced stage (II to IV): 15/25 (60%) MA of the cervix, 25/43 (58%) MLA of the endometrium, and 7/18 (39%) MLA of the ovary.
  • Overall recurrence occurred in 46/89 (52%) of cases.
  • Recurrence rates by site: 12/24 (50%) MA of the cervix, 24/41 (59%) MLA of the endometrium, and 10/24 (42%) MLA of the ovary.
  • When recurrence occurred, it was most commonly distant: 9/12 (75%) MA of the cervix, 22/24 (92%) MLA of the endometrium, and 5/9 (56%) MLA of the ovary.
  • Five-year disease-specific survival was 74% (n=26) for MA of the cervix, 72% (n=43) for MLA of the endometrium, and 71% (n=23) for MLA of the ovary.
  • The authors conclude mesonephric neoplasms are a clinically aggressive group with a predilection for pulmonary recurrence.
Limitations: Observational case series design with potential selection bias inherent to retrospective multi-institutional cohorts.; Subgroup sample sizes are small for some analyses (for example ovarian MLA denominators of 18-24 cases), limiting precision.; Abstract does not report treatment details, follow-up duration, or statistical analyses.; No control or comparator group reported..

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed · Jun 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed · Full text

Browse all studies mentioning Mesonephric Adenocarcinoma

Study mix

3 published studies by what they were done in. Lab and animal findings often do not carry over to people.

3 Human
Reported directionReported positive2Reported negative1

Clinical trials in Mesonephric Adenocarcinoma

Loading current trials from ClinicalTrials.gov… Search ClinicalTrials.gov →

Getting care & support

Nonprofit / Gov

Practical, vetted help for Mesonephric Adenocarcinoma — advocacy, paying for treatment, second opinions, and caregivers.

If you’re struggling emotionally, you don’t have to wait.

Advocacy & community

No dedicated organization for this specific cancer is curated yet — these general organizations can help in the meantime.

Financial help

  • PAN FoundationCopay assistance funds by diagnosis (funds open and close as money allows). · status changes often — check the fund’s site
  • HealthWell FoundationCopay and premium assistance funds by disease. · status changes often — check the fund’s site
  • CancerCare — financial assistanceLimited grants plus free financial counseling. · status changes often — check the fund’s site
  • Family ReachHelp with everyday living costs (rent, transport, food) during treatment. · status changes often — check the fund’s site
  • NeedyMedsSearchable directory of drug patient-assistance and discount programs. · status changes often — check the fund’s site
What you’ll typically need to apply
  • Your diagnosis and, if you have it, the specific drug/treatment name (from your care team).
  • Insurance details — your member ID card, or a note that you're uninsured (some funds require active insurance, some don't).
  • Proof of income and household size (recent pay stubs, a tax return, or a benefits letter) — most funds are income-based.
  • Your prescriber's contact information; some programs need the clinic to submit part of the application.
  • Apply early and re-check: funds open and close as money is available, so a closed fund may reopen.

General guidance — each program sets its own eligibility. Confirm requirements on the program’s site.

Second opinions

Caregiver support

We list only non-profit and government resources — never product sellers — and take no affiliate fees. If a link is broken or a resource doesn't meet that bar, tell us.

Heading to an appointment? Get a printable one-page summary — studied compounds, open trials, interactions, and questions to ask.
Bring this to your appointment →