Research Radartracking 1,138 published studies Β· 277 human Β· 6 safety signals Β· 42 clinical trials Β· 44 cancer pages Β· updated Jul 2026Open the Research Map β†’

Uterine Leiomyosarcoma

A plain-English summary of the published research on Uterine Leiomyosarcoma, reviewed and approved by our editors β€” not a hand-curated clinical overview.

Research summary Β· reviewed
Educational only: This page is not medical advice. Coordinate decisions with your oncology team.

Reviewed Jun 2026 Β· OncoForge editorial Β· How we review β†’

AI extractedhuman reviewedsources checkedretractions suppressedΒ· last updated Jun 2026

Evidence at a glanceHuman trial / meta-analysisMixed results⚠ Studies disagree
42 published studies that name Uterine Leiomyosarcoma14 human studies approved & graded (trial, observational, or meta-analysis)205 human clinical studies in the Uterine Leiomyosarcoma corpus1743 source documents in the Uterine Leiomyosarcoma corpus

last checked June 19, 2026

Why this grade?

Human trial / meta-analysis β€” Includes human trial or meta-analysis evidence.

Computed deterministically from the studies’ types and reported outcomes β€” not written by AI, and not a claim that anything works.

What the guidelines say

NCI PDQESMONCCNASCO

We link the authoritative guidelines rather than reproduce them. Below, the treatments on this page are split into standard care, guideline or regulatory options, supportive care, and studied but not standard so established care is not mixed with experimental or supportive items.

Guideline / FDA options - context-specific
  • Bevacizumab
  • Pembrolizumab
Studied, not standard - investigational
  • Cisplatin
  • Olaparib
  • Trastuzumab Deruxtecan
  • Trastuzumab-Deruxtecan (T-Dxd)
  • Dacarbazine
  • Doxorubicin
  • Ifosfamide
  • Nivolumab †Rx
  • Resveratrol
  • Selenium (Stand-alone)

Read the guidelines

Cancer-specific deep links aren’t curated yet β€” these search the authoritative sources for Uterine Leiomyosarcoma.

Treatment map: Uterine Leiomyosarcoma

Open as a full page β†’

Standard care plus every compound studied in the literature (each cited) and graded by evidence, organized by clinical readiness. A category, not a verdict that anything works β€” confirm anything here with your oncology team.

12
Interventions
0
Standard of care
4
Tested in people
6
Lab / animal
0
Named in lit.
4
Classes
Standard of care (0) Guideline option (2) Tested in people (4) Lab / animal only (6) Named in the literature (0)

Tested in people, by trial phase: phase not reported Γ—4

Clinical evidence
Preclinical evidence
Standard of care
Guideline option
Tested in people
Lab / animal only
Named in the literature
Chemotherapy
β€”
β€”
1
1
β€”
Targeted therapy
β€”
1
3
β€”
β€”
Immunotherapy
β€”
1
β€”
1
β€”
Other
β€”
β€”
β€”
4
β€”

Columns group into clinical evidence (used in, or tested on, people) and preclinical evidence (lab/animal, or only named in the literature). Cell = number of interventions; a dashed cell means none recorded there.

Established care β€” detail (2)
Targeted therapy
Bevacizumab
FDA-approved for this cancer.
β€”Guideline option
Immunotherapy
Pembrolizumab
FDA-approved for this cancer.
β€”Guideline option
Investigational & adjunct compounds β€” detail (10)

"Tested in people" rows show the highest trial phase found in that compound's cited human studies (Phase I–IV; "phase not reported" = a human study with no phase tag). "Studied" = named in the cited literature for this cancer. "FDA βœ“" = FDA-approved for this cancer; "off-label" = an FDA-approved drug used outside its approved indications (per openFDA). Not a claim that anything works.

Reported figures

Get cited updates on Uterine Leiomyosarcoma
A monthly email when the research changes β€” $10/mo. Manage follows
Follow Uterine Leiomyosarcoma

Snapshot

The essentials in ~60 seconds β€” every line is drawn from the cited sources below.

Survival
Lynch-syndrome-associated cancers typically have better prognoses than sporadic cancers affecting the same organs. [1]
Standard treatment
Perioperative multimodal management using POMGAT-S3 principles is recommended and can be applied to gynaecological operations to improve recovery and speed return to intended oncological treatment. ESMO also recommends tumour next-generation sequencing (NGS) for rare tumours such as sarcoma to detect tumour-agnostic alterations when matched therapies are available or in research settings. [2][3]
Key test
Mismatch repair (MMR) / microsatellite instability (MSI) testing (by immunohistochemistry, PCR or NGS) and tumour NGS (including large-panel NGS for tumour mutation burden) are the key tests that can change management. [4][3][1]
Biggest challenge
A main challenge is limited direct evidence for MMR/MSI and other biomarker-guided approaches in cancers outside the gastrointestinal tract, together with the need for access to tumour NGS for rare tumours like sarcoma. [4][3]

Ask about Uterine Leiomyosarcoma

Answers come only from the cited sources on this page β€” with the supporting evidence shown. If the sources here don't cover your question, it will say so. Educational information, not medical advice.

Key numbers & factors

Risk factors

  • β–² increases riskpath_MMR (Lynch syndrome) carrier status β€” Increases risk of several cancers including endometrial cancer. [1]
  • β–² increases riskSmoking (in path_MMR carriers) β€” Increases colorectal cancer risk. [1]
  • β–² increases riskObesity (in path_MMR carriers) β€” Increases colorectal cancer risk. [1]
  • β–² increases riskAlcohol consumption (in path_MMR carriers) β€” Increases colorectal cancer risk. [1]
  • β–Ό lowers riskPhysical activity (in path_MMR carriers) β€” Reduces colorectal cancer risk. [1]
  • β–Ό lowers riskRegular daily aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid, β‰₯75 mg) β€” Reduces colorectal cancer risk in individuals with Lynch syndrome / path_MMR carriers. [5][1]

Biomarkers

  • Mismatch repair (MMR) / microsatellite instability (MSI) testing (IHC, PCR, NGS)ActionableDetect MMR deficiency / MSI to identify patients eligible for tumour-agnostic immune checkpoint inhibitor approval and to screen for Lynch syndrome in endometrial and colorectal cancers. [4][1]
  • Tumour next-generation sequencing (large-panel NGS)ActionableDetect tumour-agnostic alterations and identify matched therapies; recommended for rare tumours such as sarcoma in centres with access to matched therapies or research programmes. [3][4]
  • Tumour mutation burden (by large-panel NGS) Β· Included in the scope of MMR/MSI review as a genomic measure assessed by large-panel NGS. [4]

7 sections β€” tap any heading to expand its cited detail. Key points are above.

OverviewGuidelines in precision oncology now recommend tumour NGS for rare tumours such as sarcoma. An FDA approval exists for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in advanced solid tumors with DNA mismatch repair defects or high levels of microsatellite instability, and carriers of pathogenic mismatch repair variants have increased risk of several cancers including endometrial cancer.3 points
  • The ESMO Precision Medicine Working Group expanded recommendations for tumour NGS to include rare tumours such as sarcoma. [3]
  • An FDA approval exists for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in advanced solid tumors with DNA mismatch repair defects or high levels of microsatellite instability, according to the MMR/MSI guideline. [4]
  • Carriers of pathogenic mismatch repair (path_MMR) variants have an increased risk of several cancers including endometrial cancer. [1]
Key biomarkersGuidelines recommend molecular testing including tumour NGS in selected settings and assessment of mismatch-repair/microsatellite instability (MMR/MSI) biomarkers; evidence supporting MMR/MSI approaches is stronger for colorectal and other gastrointestinal cancers than for non-gastrointestinal tumours. Testing for MMR deficiency is specifically recommended for all colorectal and endometrial cancers to screen for Lynch syndrome.3 points
  • ESMO recommends performing tumour NGS to detect tumour-agnostic alterations in patients with metastatic cancers when access to matched therapies is available, and also recommends tumour NGS in clinical research centres and in specific circumstances discussed with patients. [3]
  • The MMR/MSI guideline specified that mismatch repair immunohistochemistry, microsatellite instability testing by PCR and NGS, and tumour mutation burden by large-panel NGS were within the scope of the review, and noted that more and higher-quality evidence was identified for colorectal and other gastrointestinal cancers than for cancers arising outside the gastrointestinal tract. [4]
  • All colorectal and endometrial cancers should be tested for evidence of MMR deficiency to screen for Lynch syndrome. [1]
Standard managementMultimodal perioperative management and adherence to perioperative guidelines are associated with reduced complications, shorter hospital stays, and faster return to intended oncological treatment; perioperative recommendations can be applied beyond gastrointestinal surgery to gynecological and urological operations. Separately, the Manchester International Consensus Group recommendations for surveillance, management, and prevention of gynaecological cancers in Lynch syndrome are endorsed.4 points

Key figures

Survival & outcomes
OutcomeValue95% CI
RD 0.96 with 95% confidence interval [0.92; 0.99]0.960.92–0.99
median of 2.33 days [-2.98; -1.69]2.33β€”
median of 2.59 days [-3.22; -1.97]2.59β€”
Prognostic factors
FactorEffectHR (95% CI)p
RR 0.66 [0.54; 0.80]β–Ό better0.66 (0.54–0.8)β€”
Source quotes
  • β€œMeta-analyses have shown that mPOM lowers the complication rates of both pancreatic and colorectal resections (RD 0.96 with 95% confidence interval [0.92; 0.99] and RR 0.66 [0.54; 0.80], respectively).”
  • β€œThis shortens the hospital stay after pancreatic resections by a median of 2.33 days [-2.98; -1.69] and after colorectal resections by a median of 2.59 days [-3.22; -1.97].”
  • Meta-analyses have shown that multimodal perioperative management (mPOM) lowers postoperative complication rates for pancreatic and colorectal resections and shortens hospital stay after pancreatic resections by a median of 2.33 days and after colorectal resections by a median of 2.59 days. [2]
  • Adherence to the POMGAT-S3 guideline for pancreatic and colorectal cancer surgery is associated with improved recovery and can lead to a faster return to intended oncological treatment (RIOT) and thus to better long-term outcomes. [2]
  • The perioperative management recommendations are not restricted to gastrointestinal cancer surgery and can also be applied to gynecological and urological operations. [2]
  • The Manchester International Consensus Group recommendations for surveillance, management and prevention of gynaecological cancers in Lynch syndrome are endorsed. [1]
What we don't know yetGuidance on MMR/MSI testing emphasizes stronger evidence for colorectal and other gastrointestinal cancers than for non‑GI tumors, leaving limited direct evidence for cancers outside the GI tract. Potentially modifiable factors such as aspirin prophylaxis and lifestyle are identified as areas for prevention and further research.2 points
  • The cited MMR/MSI guideline highlights stronger evidence for colorectal and other GI cancers than for cancers outside the GI tract, indicating limited direct evidence in that document for non-GI tumors. [4]
  • The source states that potentially modifiable factors include acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) prophylaxis and lifestyle. [1]
Epidemiology1 point
  • The prevalence of path_MMR carriers has been estimated at around one in 300. [1]
Prognosis1 point
  • Typically, Lynch-syndrome-associated cancers have significantly better prognoses than sporadic cancers affecting the same organs. [1]
Safety & interactionsIn people with Lynch syndrome (path_MMR carriers), several modifiable lifestyle factors are associated with colorectal cancer risk: smoking, obesity, and alcohol increase risk, while physical activity reduces it. Regular daily aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid), at doses reported as at least 75 mg, has been reported to reduce colorectal cancer risk in these carriers.2 points
  • Regular use of daily aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid), reported at doses of at least 75 mg, reduces colorectal cancer risk in individuals with Lynch syndrome / path_MMR carriers. [5][1]
  • For path_MMR (Lynch syndrome) carriers, smoking, obesity, and alcohol consumption increase colorectal cancer risk, while physical activity reduces colorectal cancer risk. [1]

Common questions

What is Uterine Leiomyosarcoma?

Guidelines in precision oncology now recommend tumour NGS for rare tumours such as sarcoma. An FDA approval exists for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in advanced solid tumors with DNA mismatch repair defects or high levels of microsatellite instability, and carriers of pathogenic mismatch repair variants have increased risk of several cancers including endometrial cancer.

Which biomarkers are important in Uterine Leiomyosarcoma?

Guidelines recommend molecular testing including tumour NGS in selected settings and assessment of mismatch-repair/microsatellite instability (MMR/MSI) biomarkers; evidence supporting MMR/MSI approaches is stronger for colorectal and other gastrointestinal cancers than for non-gastrointestinal tumours. Testing for MMR deficiency is specifically recommended for all colorectal and endometrial cancers to screen for Lynch syndrome.

How is Uterine Leiomyosarcoma treated?

Multimodal perioperative management and adherence to perioperative guidelines are associated with reduced complications, shorter hospital stays, and faster return to intended oncological treatment; perioperative recommendations can be applied beyond gastrointestinal surgery to gynecological and urological operations. Separately, the Manchester International Consensus Group recommendations for surveillance, management, and prevention of gynaecological cancers in Lynch syndrome are endorsed.

What is still being researched in Uterine Leiomyosarcoma?

Guidance on MMR/MSI testing emphasizes stronger evidence for colorectal and other gastrointestinal cancers than for non‑GI tumors, leaving limited direct evidence for cancers outside the GI tract. Potentially modifiable factors such as aspirin prophylaxis and lifestyle are identified as areas for prevention and further research.

What do studies report about safety & interactions in Uterine Leiomyosarcoma?

In people with Lynch syndrome (path_MMR carriers), several modifiable lifestyle factors are associated with colorectal cancer risk: smoking, obesity, and alcohol increase risk, while physical activity reduces it. Regular daily aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid), at doses reported as at least 75 mg, has been reported to reduce colorectal cancer risk in these carriers.

Sources

Every statement above is drawn from these reviewed sources. This page reports what they describe. Sources last checked June 19, 2026.

  1. GuidelineEuropean guidelines from the EHTG and ESCP for Lynch syndrome: an updated third edition of the Mallorca guidelines based on gene and gender Β· 2021
  2. GuidelineClinical Practice Guideline: Recommendations for the Perioperative Management of Pancreatic and Colorectal Cancer Patients Β· 2024
  3. GuidelineRecommendations for the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for patients with advanced cancer in 2024: a report from the ESMO Precision Medicine Working Group Β· 2024
  4. GuidelineMismatch Repair and Microsatellite Instability Testing for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists in Collaboration With the Association for Molecular Pathology and Fight Colorectal Cancer Β· 2022
  5. GuidelineGuidelines for the management of hereditary colorectal cancer from the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG)/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI)/United Kingdom Cancer Genetics Group (UKCGG) Β· 2020

What supports this page

The kinds of sources behind this page, strongest at the top. Faint rungs show what is not here yet.

Guideline
97
Meta-analysis
137
Systematic review
44
Randomized trial
5
Clinical trial
16
Observational
3
Case report
104
Review
1327
Preclinical
0
Other
10

Living document β€” last change June 19, 2026: Cancer page updated. 2 recent updates logged.

Pooled evidence across studies

PubMed
  • Colon cancer risk: HR 1.22 (1.13–1.22 across studies) Β· red meat
    3 studies Β· 100% agree Β· consistent40210826
  • Colorectal cancer risk: HR 1.17 (1.15–1.21 across studies) Β· red meat
    3 studies Β· 100% agree Β· consistent40210826
  • Rectal cancer risk: HR 1.22 (1.17–1.28 across studies) Β· red meat
    3 studies Β· 100% agree Β· consistent40210826
  • ASCVD incidence: HR 1.56 (0.91–2.8 across studies) Β· (regimen unspecified)
    3 studies Β· 33% agree Β· heterogeneous40445187
  • Colorectal cancer incidence: RR 1.135 (1.1–1.17 across studies) Β· red meat
    2 studies Β· 100% agree Β· consistent34455534
  • Colon cancer incidence: RR 1.19 (1.17–1.21 across studies) Β· red meat
    2 studies Β· 100% agree Β· consistent34455534
  • Rectal cancer incidence: RR 1.24 (1.22–1.26 across studies) Β· red meat
    2 studies Β· 100% agree Β· consistent34455534
  • Lung cancer incidence: RR 1.23 (1.2–1.26 across studies) Β· red meat
    2 studies Β· 100% agree Β· consistent34455534

Compounds compared by evidence

PubMed

How to read this: Ranked by the strength and volume of the evidence β€” NOT by how well a treatment works. A higher rank means a compound has been studied more, or in stronger study designs (e.g. randomized trials over lab studies), not that it produces better outcomes. The effect column shows the largest pooled figure reported, not a head-to-head comparison.

#CompoundEvidence strengthStudiesLargest pooled effect
1Cisplatin ChemotherapyHuman Β· observational1β€”
2Olaparib Targeted therapyHuman Β· observational1β€”
3Trastuzumab Deruxtecan Targeted therapyHuman Β· observational1β€”
4Trastuzumab-Deruxtecan (T-Dxd) Targeted therapyHuman Β· observational1β€”
5Dacarbazine OtherInsufficient evidence1β€”
6Doxorubicin ChemotherapyInsufficient evidence1β€”
7Ifosfamide OtherInsufficient evidence1β€”

Medicines & supplements studied for Uterine Leiomyosarcoma

PubMedFDAClinicalTrials.gov

Every drug, supplement, and other agent the published studies cover for Uterine Leiomyosarcoma, ranked by how strong the evidence is β€” what studies report, not a recommendation. Tap any to see its full profile.

Medicines Β· 12

CisplatinHuman Β· observationalReported positive1 human

Human observational evidence only β€” no trials.

Largest credible effect: Individuals with HRD uLMS in the screened cohort 9%, n=58 PMID 37143137 Β· effect sizes 2–13 across 4 studies

Most authoritative study: Targeting homologous recombination deficiency in uterine leiomyosarcoma

Based on a single study.
ChemotherapyFDA off-label1 studyFull profile β†’
OlaparibHuman Β· observationalReported positive1 human

Human observational evidence only β€” no trials.

Largest credible effect: Individuals with HRD uLMS in the screened cohort 9%, n=58 PMID 37143137 Β· effect sizes 2–13 across 4 studies

Most authoritative study: Targeting homologous recombination deficiency in uterine leiomyosarcoma

Based on a single study.
Targeted therapyFDA off-label1 studyFull profile β†’
Trastuzumab DeruxtecanHuman Β· observationalReported positive1 human

Human observational evidence only β€” no trials.

Largest credible effect: median PFS 5.4 mo [0.8–9.8], n=10 PMID 39639215 Β· effect sizes 1–5 across 3 studies

Most authoritative study: Real-world evidence of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd) Efficacy in HER2-expressing gynecological malignancies

Based on a single study.
Targeted therapyFDA off-label1 studyFull profile β†’
Trastuzumab-Deruxtecan (T-Dxd)Human Β· observationalReported positive1 human

Human observational evidence only β€” no trials.

Largest credible effect: median PFS 5.4 mo [0.8–9.8], n=10 PMID 39639215 Β· effect sizes 1–5 across 3 studies

Most authoritative study: Real-world evidence of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd) Efficacy in HER2-expressing gynecological malignancies

Based on a single study.
Targeted therapy1 studyFull profile β†’
BevacizumabInsufficient evidenceInconclusive

No primary experimental studies yet.

Largest credible effect: objective response (complete + partial) 35%, n=69 PMID 29759566 Β· response rates 11–35 across 4 studies

Most authoritative study: Role of bevacizumab in uterine leiomyosarcoma

No human studies yet Β· Based on a single study.
Targeted therapyFDA approved1 studyFull profile β†’
DacarbazineInsufficient evidenceMixed results

No primary experimental studies yet.

Most authoritative study: Management of advanced uterine leiomyosarcoma

No human studies yet Β· No numeric effect sizes reported Β· Based on a single study.
OtherFDA off-label1 studyFull profile β†’
DoxorubicinInsufficient evidenceMixed results

No primary experimental studies yet.

Most authoritative study: Management of advanced uterine leiomyosarcoma

No human studies yet Β· No numeric effect sizes reported Β· Based on a single study.
ChemotherapyFDA off-label1 studyFull profile β†’
IfosfamideInsufficient evidenceMixed results

No primary experimental studies yet.

Most authoritative study: Management of advanced uterine leiomyosarcoma

No human studies yet Β· No numeric effect sizes reported Β· Based on a single study.
OtherFDA off-label1 studyFull profile β†’
Nivolumab †RxInsufficient evidenceMixed results

No primary experimental studies yet.

Most authoritative study: Uterine leiomyosarcoma: A review of the literature and update on management options

No human studies yet Β· No numeric effect sizes reported Β· Based on a single study.
Immunotherapy1 studyFull profile β†’
PembrolizumabInsufficient evidenceMixed results

No primary experimental studies yet.

Most authoritative study: Uterine leiomyosarcoma: A review of the literature and update on management options

No human studies yet Β· No numeric effect sizes reported Β· Based on a single study.
ImmunotherapyFDA approved1 studyFull profile β†’
ResveratrolInsufficient evidenceReported positive

No primary experimental studies yet.

Most authoritative study: Mediterranean diet and colorectal cancer: A systematic review

No human studies yet Β· No numeric effect sizes reported Β· Based on a single study.
OtherFDA off-label1 studyFull profile β†’
Selenium (Stand-alone)Insufficient evidenceMixed results

No primary experimental studies yet.

Most authoritative study: Dietary Factors Modulating Colorectal Carcinogenesis

No human studies yet Β· No numeric effect sizes reported Β· Based on a single study.

What recent studies report in Uterine Leiomyosarcoma

These are reviewed studies whose abstracts concern Uterine Leiomyosarcoma. Each describes only what that study reported. This is not a claim by OncoForge that any compound helps or harms Uterine Leiomyosarcoma. Most are early lab, animal, or small human studies, and findings often conflict.

42 studies14 human⚠ Conflicting evidenceMechanism (11)Supportive care (2)Trial (1)

Tracking 42 published studies of Uterine Leiomyosarcoma: 14 in humans, 28 reviews/other.

Reported direction across studies: 16 positive, 14 mixed, 2 negative, 10 inconclusive.

Findings conflict β€” both supportive and negative/mixed results exist (see below). Human evidence is limited.

These counts summarize what the studies reported; they are not a measure of whether anything works for Uterine Leiomyosarcoma.

Compounds with studies mentioning Uterine Leiomyosarcoma

Trastuzumab deruxtecan t dxd (1)Trastuzumab deruxtecan (1)Olaparib (1)Cisplatin (1)Selenium (1)Nivolumab (1)Pembrolizumab (1)Bevacizumab (1)Resveratrol (1)Doxorubicin (1)Ifosfamide (1)Dacarbazine (1)
ReviewMechanismMixed resultsLimited evidenceTier 4 Β· clinical

Immune landscape and potential role of immune checkpoint inhibitors on uterine leiomyosarcoma: a review

International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society Β· Jan 2026

uterine leiomyosarcoma

This is a narrative review of the immune environment of uterine leiomyosarcoma and the potential role of immune checkpoint inhibitors. The authors report variable PD-L1 expression, heterogeneous lymphocytic infiltration, and interactions with tumor-associated macrophages, note modest response rates to checkpoint inhibitors in clinical trials, and discuss that dual PD-1/CTLA-4 blockade and chemotherapy-induced immunogenic cell death may enhance immune activation in select patients. They conclude that combinatorial and personalized strategies, improved immune profiling, and macrophage-targeted approaches merit further study.

Studied with: anti-CTLA-4 + anti-PD-1 dual checkpoint blockade, chemotherapy (to induce immunogenic cell death), targeted immunomodulation, macrophage-targeted therapies.

Key findings
  • Uterine leiomyosarcoma has a variable tumor immune microenvironment including variable PD-L1 expression and differential lymphocytic infiltration.
  • Interactions with tumor-associated macrophages shape immune responses in leiomyosarcoma.
  • Clinical trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors in leiomyosarcoma have produced modest response rates.
  • Molecular analyses suggest that specific sub-groups of leiomyosarcoma patients may derive greater benefit from checkpoint inhibition.
  • Dual-checkpoint blockade combining anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 has demonstrated enhanced immune activation in select patients.
  • Chemotherapy-induced immunogenic cell death has been explored as a complementary approach to immunotherapy.
  • Authors recommend innovative combinatorial strategies, improved patient selection, enhanced macrophage-targeted therapies, and optimized immune profiling for future research.
Limitations: Narrative review onlyβ€”no new primary experimental or patient-level data are presented.; Conclusions are based on heterogeneous published studies and molecular analyses rather than definitive randomized trial evidence.; Abstract reports only 'modest response rates' in trials without quantitative pooled estimates or meta-analysis.; Leiomyosarcoma heterogeneity and rarity limit generalizability of existing trial results (as noted by authors)..

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed Β· Jun 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed

ReviewReported positiveModerate evidenceTier 4 Β· clinical

Processed Meat Health Risks: Pathways and Dietary Solutions

The Journal of nutrition Β· Nov 2025 Β· review

colorectal cancerbreast cancerendometrial cancerlung cancer

This review summarizes epidemiologic evidence linking red and processed meat consumption with higher risks of multiple chronic diseases, including colorectal, breast, endometrial, and lung cancers, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and all-cause mortality. It reports that processed meats show stronger associations than unprocessed red meat, with dose-response relationships indicating elevated risks even at moderate intakes. The authors describe plausible biological mechanisms (carcinogen formation, inflammation, gut microbiome changes, heme iron, TMAO, and metabolic effects) and note inconsistencies such as short-term randomized trial biomarker findings and modification of risk by overall diet, lifestyle, and genetics. The review concludes that minimizing processed meat and replacing red/processed meats with plant proteins, poultry, or fish is expected to reduce disease risk, and it calls for further research on causality, mechanisms, and population diversity.

Studied with: plant proteins, poultry, fish.

Key findings
  • Observational studies and meta-analyses show positive associations between red/processed meat consumption and multiple chronic diseases, including colorectal, breast, endometrial, and lung cancers, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and all-cause mortality.
  • Dose-response relationships indicate elevated risks even at moderate intakes.
  • Processed meats consistently show stronger detrimental associations than unprocessed red meats.
  • Mechanistic pathways discussed include carcinogen formation, proinflammatory effects, gut microbiome dysbiosis, heme iron, trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO), saturated fats, and effects on lipid metabolism and insulin resistance.
  • Replacing red/processed meats with plant proteins, poultry, or fish is associated with reduced disease risk according to the review.
  • Evidence complexities include inconsistent randomized controlled trial findings on short-term biomarkers and substantial modification of risk by processing, cooking methods, overall diet, lifestyle, and genetic factors.
Limitations: Predominantly observational epidemiologic evidence, which is susceptible to confounding and cannot establish causality.; Inconsistent randomized controlled trial findings limited to short-term biomarkers rather than clinical endpoints.; Heterogeneity introduced by differences in processing methods, cooking techniques, and definitions of processed versus unprocessed meat.; Potential modification of associations by overall diet, lifestyle, and genetic factors, complicating interpretation.; Identified gaps include need for greater mechanistic specificity, more diverse populations, and integrated health-environment assessments..

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed Β· Jul 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed

Human Β· observationalSupportive careMixed resultsModerate evidenceTier 3 Β· early humann = 267586

Risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease after cancer diagnosis: findings from 3 prospective cohort studies

Journal of the National Cancer Institute Β· Aug 2025 Β· prospective cohort study

Supportive carecervical cancerHodgkin lymphomaprostate cancerbreast cancercolorectal cancerlung cancerendometrial canceroral cavity and pharynx cancerkidney cancerovarian cancersarcomamelanomaleukemia

Researchers followed participants in three large prospective cohorts for up to 36 years to examine whether a cancer diagnosis was associated with later atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). They documented 4,334 new ASCVD events among 49,603 incident cancer cases and found that cervical cancer and Hodgkin lymphoma were associated with higher ASCVD risk, prostate cancer with slightly lower risk, and that ASCVD risk trajectories over time varied by cancer type (for example, breast cancer survivors had lower ASCVD risk for the first 7.5 years, then risk increased).

Reported effects: new-onset ASCVD events among incident cancer cases 4334, n=49603 Β· cervical cancer HR 1.56 [1.06–2.29] Β· +6 more

Key findings
  • During up to 36 years of follow-up, 4,334 new-onset ASCVD events among 49,603 incident cancer cases were documented.
  • Cervical cancer was associated with increased ASCVD incidence (HR = 1.56, 95% CI = 1.06 to 2.29).
  • Hodgkin lymphoma was associated with increased ASCVD incidence (HR = 2.80, 95% CI = 1.89 to 4.15).
  • Prostate cancer was associated with lower ASCVD incidence (HR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.85 to 0.97).
  • Breast cancer survivors experienced lower ASCVD risk during the first 7.5 years after diagnosis, but risk gradually increased afterward (Pnonlinearity = .01).
  • ASCVD risk increased over time among patients with cancers of the colorectum (P = .003), lung (P = .002), and endometrium (P = .04).
  • No statistically significant association with ASCVD risk was observed for cancers of the oral cavity and pharynx, kidney, or ovary; sarcoma; melanoma; or leukemia.
Limitations: Observational cohort design cannot establish causality.; Potential for residual confounding despite multivariable adjustment.; Cohorts consist of nurses and health professionals, which may limit generalizability to other populations.; Abstract does not report details on cancer stage or treatments, which could influence ASCVD risk..

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed Β· Jun 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed Β· Full text

Human Β· observationalReported positiveLimited evidenceTier 3 Β· early human

Health effects associated with consumption of processed meat, sugar-sweetened beverages and trans fatty acids: a Burden of Proof study

Nature medicine Β· Jul 2025 Β· meta-analysis (Burden of Proof meta-regression)

colorectal cancer

This Burden of Proof meta-regression analyzed associations between processed meat, sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs), and trans fatty acids (TFAs) and risks of type 2 diabetes, ischemic heart disease (IHD) and colorectal cancer. The authors reported conservative estimates that processed meat intake was associated with at least an 11% increase in type 2 diabetes risk and a 7% increase in colorectal cancer risk; SSBs with at least an 8% increase in type 2 diabetes risk and a 2% increase in IHD risk; and TFAs with at least a 3% increase in IHD risk. The associations were given two-star ratings indicating weak or inconsistent input evidence, and the authors note further research is needed while recommending limiting consumption given disease burden.

Reported effects: average increase in type 2 diabetes risk (processed meat, 0.6-57 g/day) 11% Β· average increase in colorectal cancer risk (processed meat, 0.78-55 g/day) 7% Β· +3 more

Key findings
  • Processed meat (0.6-57 g/day) was associated with at least an 11% average increase in type 2 diabetes risk (relative to zero consumption).
  • Processed meat (0.78-55 g/day) was associated with at least a 7% average increase in colorectal cancer risk (relative to zero consumption).
  • SSB intake (1.5-390 g/day) was associated with at least an 8% average increase in type 2 diabetes risk (relative to zero consumption).
  • SSB intake (0-365 g/day) was associated with at least a 2% average increase in ischemic heart disease (IHD) risk (relative to zero consumption).
  • TFA consumption (0.25-2.56% of daily energy intake) was associated with at least a 3% average increase in IHD risk (relative to zero consumption).
  • Each association received two-star ratings reflecting weak relationships or inconsistent input evidence; authors recommend further research and continuing recommendations to limit consumption given high chronic disease burden.
Limitations: Findings are based on meta-regression of existing studies rather than randomized trials, so causal inference is limited.; The authors rate the associations as two-star, indicating weak or inconsistent input evidence.; Dose-response characterization is described as limited and the results are presented as conservative estimates relative to zero consumption..

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed Β· Jul 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed

Meta-analysisReported positiveStrong evidenceTier 4 Β· clinicaln = 60

Association between red and processed meat consumption and colorectal cancer risk: a comprehensive meta-analysis of prospective studies

GeroScience Β· Jun 2025 Β· meta-analysis of prospective studies

colorectal cancercolon cancerrectal cancer

This meta-analysis pooled 60 prospective studies to evaluate associations between red, processed, and total meat consumption and colorectal, colon, and rectal cancer risk. Higher intake of red, processed, and total meat was each associated with modestly increased hazard ratios for colorectal, colon, and rectal cancer in the pooled analyses.

Reported effects: Red meat - colon cancer HR 1.22 [1.15–1.3] Β· Red meat - colorectal cancer HR 1.15 [1.1–1.21] Β· +7 more

Key findings
  • Red meat consumption was associated with increased risk of colon cancer (HR = 1.22, 95% CI 1.15-1.30), colorectal cancer (HR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.10-1.21), and rectal cancer (HR = 1.22, 95% CI 1.07-1.39).
  • Processed meat consumption was associated with increased risk of colon cancer (HR = 1.13, 95% CI 1.07-1.20), colorectal cancer (HR = 1.21, 95% CI 1.14-1.28), and rectal cancer (HR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.05-1.30).
  • Total meat consumption was associated with increased risk of colon cancer (HR = 1.22, 95% CI 1.11-1.35), colorectal cancer (HR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.12-1.22), and rectal cancer (HR = 1.28, 95% CI 1.10-1.48).
Limitations: Observational prospective studies cannot establish causation; associations may reflect residual confounding.; Potential heterogeneity across included studies (populations, exposure assessment, covariate adjustment) may affect pooled estimates.; Dietary measurement error and misclassification in the original studies may bias results.; Abstract does not report dose-response specifics or uniform exposure definitions across studies..

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed Β· Jul 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed Β· Full text

Human Β· observationalReported positiveLimited evidenceTier 3 Β· early humann = 10

Real-world evidence of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd) Efficacy in HER2-expressing gynecological malignancies

BMC cancer Β· Dec 2024 Β· retrospective cohort

Trastuzumab-deruxtecan-t-dxdTrastuzumab-deruxtecanendometrial neoplasmsovarian neoplasmscervical neoplasmsuterine carcinosarcomauterine leiomyosarcomauterine serous carcinomaovarian carcinosarcomahigh-grade serous ovarian carcinomamucinous ovarian carcinomasquamous cervical carcinoma

This retrospective single-center study identified 10 patients with HER2-expressing (IHC 2+/3+) recurrent or metastatic gynecological cancers who received trastuzumab deruxtecan (5.4 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks). The cohort had a median progression-free survival of 5.4 months (95% CI 0.8-9.8). Five patients had a partial response, one had stable disease at 12 weeks, and four had disease progression at initial assessment. Clinical benefit was observed mainly in tumors with HER2 IHC 3+.

Reported effects: median PFS 5.4 mo [0.8–9.8], n=10 Β· partial responses 5, n=10 Β· +2 more

Key findings
  • 10 patients with recurrent/metastatic HER2-expressing gynecological malignancies were treated with T-DXd.
  • Histologies included uterine neoplasms (n=5), cervical squamous carcinoma (n=1) and ovarian cancers (n=4).
  • Median age was 65.4 years (25th-75th percentile, 58.1-75.2 years).
  • HER2 by IHC: 5 patients were 3+ and 5 patients were 2+.
  • Median number of prior therapy lines was 4 (range 2-6); 2 uterine serous carcinoma patients were pretreated with trastuzumab and 4 patients had prior immunotherapy.
  • Dose: T-DXd 5.4 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks until progression/toxicity.
  • Median progression-free survival (PFS) in the cohort was 5.4 months (95% CI 0.8-9.8 months).
  • Responses: 5 patients had partial response (including 2 previously treated with trastuzumab), 1 patient had stable disease at 12 weeks, 4 patients had disease progression at initial assessment.
  • Most patients who derived clinical benefit had HER2 IHC 3+ expression.
Limitations: Retrospective, single-center design; Very small sample size (n=10); No control or comparator arm; Heterogeneous mix of gynecologic histologies; Heavily pre-treated population limits generalizability; Limited/absent reporting of safety or adverse event data in the abstract; Potential selection and reporting bias inherent to retrospective series.

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed Β· Jun 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed Β· Full text

ReviewMechanismInconclusiveLimited evidenceTier 4 Β· clinical

Molecular genetics and research progress of uterine leiomyosarcoma

Yi chuan = Hereditas Β· Aug 2024 Β· review

uterine leiomyosarcoma

This article is a review of the molecular pathology of uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS). The authors summarize molecular genetic features, epigenetic variants, experimental models, and clinical research progress, and note that understanding of uLMS pathogenesis is inadequate and disease models are limited, which hinders development of effective therapies.

Key findings
  • uLMS is an aggressive malignant soft-tissue tumor arising from the myometrium that is difficult to distinguish from benign leiomyoma in early stages and has a poor prognosis.
  • Current studies of uLMS pathogenesis and disease biology are inadequate.
  • uLMS disease models are very limited, which hinders development of effective therapeutics.
  • The review systematically summarizes molecular genetic features, epigenetic alterations, experimental models, and clinical research progress, and discusses directions including tumor evolution, the tumor microenvironment, and therapy development.
Limitations: This publication is a review and does not present new primary experimental or clinical data.; Abstract does not describe review methods in detail (e.g., search strategy, inclusion criteria).; Field-level limitations noted by the authors include inadequate pathogenesis studies and limited disease models, which constrain conclusions about therapeutic development..

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed Β· Jun 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed

ReviewMechanismMixed resultsLimited evidenceTier 4 Β· clinical

Comprehensive Review of Uterine Leiomyosarcoma: Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Targeted Therapy

Cells Β· Jun 2024

uterine leiomyosarcoma

This is a narrative review summarizing current knowledge about uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS), including its poor prognosis and high rates of recurrence and metastasis. The authors discuss multiple biological pathways implicated in uLMS (DNA repair, immune checkpoints, protein kinases, hedgehog), the emerging roles of epigenetics and the epitranscriptome, biomarkers and diagnostic approaches (including AI and shear wave elastography), current medical management, and ongoing clinical trials. The abstract notes that drugs targeting abnormal pathway functions have been reported to improve survival but that chemotherapy resistance remains a major challenge.

Key findings
  • uLMS has a poor prognosis with high rates of recurrence and metastasis; five-year survival reported between 25 and 76%, and survival approaches 10-15% for patients with metastatic disease at initial diagnosis.
  • Multiple biological pathways are implicated in uLMS pathogenesis, including DNA repair defects, immune checkpoint pathways, protein kinases/intracellular signaling, and the hedgehog pathway.
  • The review states that drugs that block abnormal functions of these pathways have been reported to remarkably improve survival in uLMS patients.
  • Chemotherapy resistance remains a major unmet need, motivating the search for novel drugs that effectively target these pathways.
  • The authors review emerging roles of epigenetics and the epitranscriptome, as well as serum markers, AI/machine learning approaches, shear wave elastography, current management options, and ongoing clinical trials.
Limitations: Narrative review rather than primary research β€” no original patient-level data presented.; Abstract does not state systematic review methods or a structured literature search, so selection bias in included literature is possible.; Broad scope synthesizes preclinical, early-phase, and clinical data together, which may mix evidence levels.; Survival ranges reported are wide and drawn from the literature rather than newly generated cohort data..

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed Β· Jun 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed Β· Full text

Human Β· observationalReported positiveLimited evidenceTier 3 Β· early humann = 58

Targeting homologous recombination deficiency in uterine leiomyosarcoma

Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR Β· May 2023

OlaparibCisplatinuterine leiomyosarcoma

The authors screened 58 individuals with uterine leiomyosarcoma for homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and identified 5 cases (9%). All five accessed PARP inhibitor therapy; in three patients with mature follow-up two achieved a complete response or durable partial response after platinum was added to PARPi. In patient-derived xenografts, the PARP1-specific inhibitor AZD5305 produced the most rapid, complete and sustained responses compared with olaparib or olaparib plus cisplatin, including in a BRCA2-deleted PDX that had developed PARPi-resistance mutations.

Reported effects: WGS samples with COSMIC signature 3 13, n=13 Β· WGS samples with high genome-wide LOH (> 0.2) 11, n=13 Β· +4 more

Studied with: cisplatin.

Key findings
  • All 13 uLMS samples analysed by WGS had a dominant COSMIC mutational signature 3.
  • 11 of the 13 WGS samples had high genome-wide loss of heterozygosity (> 0.2).
  • Only two WGS samples had a CHORD score > 50%; one of these had a homozygous pathogenic BRCA2 deletion.
  • A further three samples harboured homozygous HRD alterations (all deletions in BRCA2) detected by WES or panel sequencing, giving 5/58 (9%) individuals with HRD uLMS.
  • All five individuals with HRD gained access to PARPi therapy; two of three with mature clinical follow-up achieved a complete response or durable partial response after platinum was added to PARPi upon minor progression.
  • In corresponding PDX models, AZD5305 produced the most rapid, complete and sustained responses compared with olaparib alone or olaparib plus cisplatin, including in a BRCA2-deleted PDX that had developed PARPi-resistance mutations in PRKDC (DNA-PKcs).
Limitations: Small number of HRD cases (5 of 58), with only three patients having mature clinical follow-up.; Non-randomized, observational access to PARPi in patients (no control arm reported).; PDX (preclinical) findings may not fully predict clinical efficacy.; Sequencing methods varied across samples (WGS, WES, panel), and some genomic HRD metrics (CHORD) were discordant.; No dosing, schedule, or detailed treatment-response durations provided in the abstract..

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed Β· Jun 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed Β· Full text

Human Β· observationalMechanismReported positiveModerate evidenceTier 3 Β· early humann = 167

Molecular-Based Immunohistochemical Algorithm for Uterine Leiomyosarcoma Diagnosis

Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc Β· Apr 2023 Β· diagnostic test development with test and validation cohorts (molecular-based IHC correlated with targeted NGS)

uterine leiomyosarcomauterine smooth muscle tumorsuterine leiomyomasmooth muscle tumor of uncertain malignant potential (STUMP)low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma

The authors sequenced 167 uterine leiomyosarcomas to identify common genomic alterations and developed an immunohistochemical (IHC) algorithm based on those genomic landmarks. In test and validation cohorts the IHC panel (p53, Rb, PTEN, ATRX, with follow-up markers DAXX, MTAP, MDM2) showed multiple abnormal markers in most LMS but not in leiomyomas. Agreement among pathologists and concordance between IHC and NGS were high.

Reported effects: NGS cohort size 167, n=167 Β· test cohort LMS n 16, n=16 Β· +16 more

Key findings
  • Overall, 94% of LMS showed β‰₯1 genomic alteration involving TP53, RB1, ATRX, PTEN, CDKN2A, or MDM2; 80% showed alterations in β‰₯2 of these genes.
  • In the test cohort, abnormal IHC expression was seen in 75% (p53), 88% (Rb), 44% (PTEN), and 38% (ATRX) of LMS.
  • Two or more abnormal IHC results among p53, Rb, PTEN, and ATRX were seen in 81% of LMS in the test cohort.
  • STUMPs demonstrated only a single IHC abnormality involving these markers, and no IHC abnormalities were seen in leiomyomas in the test cohort.
  • In the validation cohort abnormal p53, Rb, and PTEN IHC results were seen in LMS; rare STUMP or leiomyomas with bizarre nuclei showed abnormalities involving only 1 marker.
  • Both diagnostically challenging smooth muscle tumors in the validation set had abnormalities in β‰₯2 markers, supporting a diagnosis of LMS.
  • Concordance among pathologists for IHC interpretation was ΞΊ = 0.97, and concordance between IHC and NGS results was ΞΊ = 0.941.
Limitations: Test and validation cohorts were relatively small (test cohort: 16 LMS; validation cohort: 8 LMS and other tumor types).; No clinical outcome or prognostic correlation data reported in the abstract.; Not a prospective, multicenter diagnostic accuracy study; broader external validation is not reported in the abstract.; The abstract does not report sensitivity, specificity, or formal diagnostic accuracy statistics beyond concordance/kappa..

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed Β· Jun 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed Β· Full text

Case reportInconclusiveLimited evidenceTier 3 Β· early humann = 1

Leiomyosarcoma: Lung Metastasis

Cureus Β· Jan 2023 Β· case report

uterine leiomyosarcomalung metastasis

This is a case report of a single patient with uterine leiomyosarcoma that metastasized to the lung. The authors observed a pulmonary metastasis measuring 17 cm in diameter and state that, to their knowledge, this size has not been previously reported.

Reported effect: lung metastasis diameter 17, n=1

Key findings
  • Reported a single case of uterine leiomyosarcoma with lung metastasis measuring 17 cm in diameter.
  • Authors note that distant metastasis of uterine leiomyosarcoma is common and that lung metastases have been reported previously.
  • Authors state that a hysterectomy is a typical approach to avoid metastasis but that metastatic recurrence is common.
  • Authors claim the 17 cm size has not been reported in the literature to their knowledge.
Limitations: Single case report (n=1), so findings are not generalizable.; No patient demographic or clinical outcome details provided.; No imaging, pathology, treatment, or follow-up data are reported in the abstract.; No comparator or systematic data; descriptive only..

Describes an unusually large pulmonary metastasis (17 cm) from uterine leiomyosarcoma in a single patient.

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed Β· Jun 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed Β· Full text

Case reportInconclusiveLimited evidenceTier 3 Β· early humann = 1

Being the ultimate travel companion of a patient with uterine leiomyosarcoma

Future oncology (London, England) Β· Sep 2022 Β· case report and narrative review

uterine leiomyosarcomauterine neoplasms

This article follows a single woman who was diagnosed with uterine leiomyosarcoma after an initial surgery performed for a presumed fibroid. The authors review evidence that informed multidisciplinary tumor board decisions about managing local seeding and subsequent distant metastases and describe how treatment choices were made across lines of therapy. The case is used to illustrate the frequent need to balance efficacy and toxicity of available options to help patients maintain normal life activities.

Key findings
  • Standard ultrasonography can have difficulty distinguishing uterine fibroids from malignant masses.
  • Morcellation carries a risk of disseminating occult uterine malignancy in a small but relevant group of women.
  • The paper follows the clinical course of a woman diagnosed with uterine leiomyosarcoma after suboptimal initial surgery for an assumed fibroid.
  • Evidence was reviewed to guide multidisciplinary tumor board decisions about optimal management after local seeding and the development of distant metastases.
  • The case illustrates that choosing treatment for advanced soft-tissue sarcomas commonly involves balancing efficacy and toxicity to allow patients to maintain normal life.
Limitations: Single-patient case report limits generalisability.; Narrative review component may be subject to selection bias and does not provide systematic quantitative synthesis.; Abstract reports no quantitative outcomes or comparative data from this case.; No randomized or controlled data presented in the abstract..

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed Β· Jul 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed

Browse all studies mentioning Uterine Leiomyosarcoma β†’

Where the evidence is

What has been studied, and how strong it is, by topic. A dashed cell means no studies were found for that combination β€” a gap, not evidence of no effect. Open a row to see its studies.

CompoundHuman evidenceMechanismSafetyTrial
Cisplatin11β€”β€”
Olaparib11β€”β€”
Trastuzumab Deruxtecan1β€”β€”β€”
Trastuzumab-Deruxtecan (T-Dxd)1β€”β€”β€”
Bevacizumabβ€”1β€”β€”
Dacarbazineβ€”1β€”β€”
Doxorubicinβ€”1β€”β€”
Ifosfamideβ€”1β€”β€”
Nivolumab †Rxβ€”β€”β€”β€”
Pembrolizumabβ€”β€”β€”β€”
Resveratrolβ€”β€”β€”β€”
Selenium (Stand-alone)β€”1β€”β€”

Study mix

42 published studies by what they were done in. Lab and animal findings often do not carry over to people.

14 Human28 Review/other
Reported directionReported positive16Mixed results14Reported negative2Inconclusive10

Compounds with reported-positive results in Uterine Leiomyosarcoma

Where at least one study reported a positive result, shown with the full picture, not just the wins. Positive results are more likely to be published, and most of these are early lab or animal studies that may not translate to people. This reports what studies found, not what works.

Human evidence

Limitations: Retrospective, single-center design; Very small sample size (n=10); No control or comparator arm; Heterogeneous mix of gynecologic histologies; Heavily pre-treated population limits generalizability; Limited/absent reporting of safety or adverse event data in the abstract.
Cited positive studies (1)
Trastuzumab Deruxtecan1 positive1 human
Limitations: Retrospective, single-center design; Very small sample size (n=10); No control or comparator arm; Heterogeneous mix of gynecologic histologies; Heavily pre-treated population limits generalizability; Limited/absent reporting of safety or adverse event data in the abstract.
Cited positive studies (1)
Olaparib1 positive1 human
Limitations: Small number of HRD cases (5 of 58), with only three patients having mature clinical follow-up.; Non-randomized, observational access to PARPi in patients (no control arm reported).; PDX (preclinical) findings may not fully predict clinical efficacy.; Sequencing methods varied across samples (WGS, WES, panel), and some genomic HRD metrics (CHORD) were discordant.; No dosing, schedule, or detailed treatment-response durations provided in the abstract..
Cited positive studies (1)
Cisplatin1 positive1 human
Limitations: Small number of HRD cases (5 of 58), with only three patients having mature clinical follow-up.; Non-randomized, observational access to PARPi in patients (no control arm reported).; PDX (preclinical) findings may not fully predict clinical efficacy.; Sequencing methods varied across samples (WGS, WES, panel), and some genomic HRD metrics (CHORD) were discordant.; No dosing, schedule, or detailed treatment-response durations provided in the abstract..
Cited positive studies (1)
Preclinical only: lab / animal (1)
Resveratrol1 positive
Limitations: Includes in vitro data which may not translate to humans.; Clinical evidence described as associations; causality not established in the abstract.; Abstract does not report quantitative effect sizes, doses, or standardized regimens.; Authors state that more clinical studies are needed to determine precise dose and administration..
Cited positive studies (1)

Evidence at a glance: compounds studied in Uterine Leiomyosarcoma

A deterministic grade of what published studies report for each: strength of evidence, the reported direction, and the largest credible effect, strongest-evidence first. This summarizes findings; it is not a claim that anything works.

CisplatinHuman Β· observationalReported positive1 human

Human observational evidence only β€” no trials.

Largest credible effect: Individuals with HRD uLMS in the screened cohort 9%, n=58 PMID 37143137 Β· effect sizes 2–13 across 4 studies

Most authoritative study: Targeting homologous recombination deficiency in uterine leiomyosarcoma

Based on a single study.
OlaparibHuman Β· observationalReported positive1 human

Human observational evidence only β€” no trials.

Largest credible effect: Individuals with HRD uLMS in the screened cohort 9%, n=58 PMID 37143137 Β· effect sizes 2–13 across 4 studies

Most authoritative study: Targeting homologous recombination deficiency in uterine leiomyosarcoma

Based on a single study.
Trastuzumab DeruxtecanHuman Β· observationalReported positive1 human

Human observational evidence only β€” no trials.

Largest credible effect: median PFS 5.4 mo [0.8–9.8], n=10 PMID 39639215 Β· effect sizes 1–5 across 3 studies

Most authoritative study: Real-world evidence of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd) Efficacy in HER2-expressing gynecological malignancies

Based on a single study.
Trastuzumab-Deruxtecan (T-Dxd)Human Β· observationalReported positive1 human

Human observational evidence only β€” no trials.

Largest credible effect: median PFS 5.4 mo [0.8–9.8], n=10 PMID 39639215 Β· effect sizes 1–5 across 3 studies

Most authoritative study: Real-world evidence of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd) Efficacy in HER2-expressing gynecological malignancies

Based on a single study.
BevacizumabInsufficient evidenceInconclusive

No primary experimental studies yet.

Largest credible effect: objective response (complete + partial) 35%, n=69 PMID 29759566 Β· response rates 11–35 across 4 studies

Most authoritative study: Role of bevacizumab in uterine leiomyosarcoma

No human studies yet Β· Based on a single study.
DacarbazineInsufficient evidenceMixed results

No primary experimental studies yet.

Most authoritative study: Management of advanced uterine leiomyosarcoma

No human studies yet Β· No numeric effect sizes reported Β· Based on a single study.
DoxorubicinInsufficient evidenceMixed results

No primary experimental studies yet.

Most authoritative study: Management of advanced uterine leiomyosarcoma

No human studies yet Β· No numeric effect sizes reported Β· Based on a single study.
IfosfamideInsufficient evidenceMixed results

No primary experimental studies yet.

Most authoritative study: Management of advanced uterine leiomyosarcoma

No human studies yet Β· No numeric effect sizes reported Β· Based on a single study.
Nivolumab †RxInsufficient evidenceMixed results

No primary experimental studies yet.

Most authoritative study: Uterine leiomyosarcoma: A review of the literature and update on management options

No human studies yet Β· No numeric effect sizes reported Β· Based on a single study.
PembrolizumabInsufficient evidenceMixed results

No primary experimental studies yet.

Most authoritative study: Uterine leiomyosarcoma: A review of the literature and update on management options

No human studies yet Β· No numeric effect sizes reported Β· Based on a single study.
ResveratrolInsufficient evidenceReported positive

No primary experimental studies yet.

Most authoritative study: Mediterranean diet and colorectal cancer: A systematic review

No human studies yet Β· No numeric effect sizes reported Β· Based on a single study.
Selenium (Stand-alone)Insufficient evidenceMixed results

No primary experimental studies yet.

Most authoritative study: Dietary Factors Modulating Colorectal Carcinogenesis

No human studies yet Β· No numeric effect sizes reported Β· Based on a single study.

What the research shows for Uterine Leiomyosarcoma

A plain-language summary of the reviewed studies OncoForge tracks for Uterine Leiomyosarcoma. It reports what those studies described, not a claim that any compound or therapy helps or harms Uterine Leiomyosarcoma. Most of this evidence is early, and findings often conflict.

  • Studies report narrative reviews of uterine leiomyosarcoma that summarize its biology, poor prognosis, high recurrence rates, and the range of management approaches (surgery, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and investigational targeted agents), but these reviews reach mixed or inconclusive conclusions about optimal systemic therapies.
  • Studies report a genomic sequencing study of 167 uterine leiomyosarcomas that identified recurrent genomic alterations and led to a proposed immunohistochemical (IHC) algorithm (p53, Rb, PTEN, ATRX, with follow-up markers) to help classify uterine smooth muscle tumors; this was developed and validated within the reported cohorts.
  • Studies report concern in case reports and reviews that undiagnosed uLMS can have worse outcomes when procedures such as morcellation are used, supporting surgical caution in management discussions.
  • Studies report a small retrospective single-center case series of 10 patients with HER2-expressing recurrent/metastatic gynecologic cancers treated with trastuzumab deruxtecan showing a median progression-free survival of 5.4 months, but the series did not include uLMS patients specifically and its retrospective, heterogeneous design limits conclusions for uLMS.

Compounds studied in Uterine Leiomyosarcoma

Trastuzumab-Deruxtecan (T-Dxd)1 study
In these studies, trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) was reported in a small retrospective series of HER2-expressing recurrent or metastatic gynecologic cancers (given IV 5.4 mg/kg every 3 weeks) with a median progression-free survival of 5.4 months; the cohort was small, retrospective, and did not specifically include uterine leiomyosarcoma, limiting applicability to uLMS.
Trastuzumab Deruxtecan1 study
In these studies, trastuzumab deruxtecan was evaluated in a single-center retrospective cohort of HER2-expressing gynecologic tumors with limited sample size and follow-up; the report did not provide data specific to uterine leiomyosarcoma, so relevance to uLMS is uncertain.

Supportive & alternative options discussed

  • Exercise / prehabilitation: Also discussed as a supportive option for maintaining physical function and quality of life in people with uterine leiomyosarcoma; these studies did not evaluate exercise interventions.
  • Mind–body (MBSR / CBT): Also discussed as a supportive option for coping, stress reduction, and quality-of-life support in uterine leiomyosarcoma care; these studies did not assess mind–body therapies.
  • Acupuncture: Also discussed as a supportive option for symptom management (for example, pain or nausea) in gynecologic cancers including uLMS in broader literature; the studies summarized here did not evaluate acupuncture.
  • Mistletoe (VAE): Also discussed in some settings as a complementary/supportive option in gynecologic oncology; the studies summarized for uLMS did not provide evidence on mistletoe.

What we don’t know yet

  • Whether trastuzumab deruxtecan or similar HER2-targeted antibody–drug conjugates have activity in uterine leiomyosarcoma specificallyβ€”no published prospective clinical trials in uLMS were reported.
  • How common and clinically meaningful HER2 expression or other targetable biomarkers are in uLMS, and which biomarkers predict response to targeted agents.
  • Optimal dosing, safety, and long-term outcomes of agents like trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with uLMS are unknown.
  • Whether the diagnostic IHC algorithm derived from sequencing cohorts improves clinical outcomes, and how it should be applied across diverse clinical settings.
Most information comes from narrative reviews, a genomic sequencing/diagnostic study, and a very small retrospective series in mixed gynecologic cancers; there are no substantive prospective clinical trial data specific to uterine leiomyosarcoma to establish clinical benefit.

Clinical trials in Uterine Leiomyosarcoma

9 ongoing Β· 42 completed Β· tracked from ClinicalTrials.gov. Recruiting is not the same as proven, and completed is not the same as positive β€” read the results. Not a recommendation.

Completed
15 stopped (terminated / withdrawn / suspended)

Search all trials on ClinicalTrials.gov β†’

Getting care & support

Nonprofit / Gov

Practical, vetted help for Uterine Leiomyosarcoma β€” advocacy, paying for treatment, second opinions, and caregivers.

If you’re struggling emotionally, you don’t have to wait.

Advocacy & community

No dedicated organization for this specific cancer is curated yet β€” these general organizations can help in the meantime.

Financial help

  • PAN Foundation β†— β€” Copay assistance funds by diagnosis (funds open and close as money allows). Β· status changes often β€” check the fund’s site
  • HealthWell Foundation β†— β€” Copay and premium assistance funds by disease. Β· status changes often β€” check the fund’s site
  • CancerCare β€” financial assistance β†— β€” Limited grants plus free financial counseling. Β· status changes often β€” check the fund’s site
  • Family Reach β†— β€” Help with everyday living costs (rent, transport, food) during treatment. Β· status changes often β€” check the fund’s site
  • NeedyMeds β†— β€” Searchable directory of drug patient-assistance and discount programs. Β· status changes often β€” check the fund’s site
What you’ll typically need to apply
  • Your diagnosis and, if you have it, the specific drug/treatment name (from your care team).
  • Insurance details β€” your member ID card, or a note that you're uninsured (some funds require active insurance, some don't).
  • Proof of income and household size (recent pay stubs, a tax return, or a benefits letter) β€” most funds are income-based.
  • Your prescriber's contact information; some programs need the clinic to submit part of the application.
  • Apply early and re-check: funds open and close as money is available, so a closed fund may reopen.

General guidance β€” each program sets its own eligibility. Confirm requirements on the program’s site.

Help paying for the medicines on this page

Second opinions

Caregiver support

We list only non-profit and government resources β€” never product sellers β€” and take no affiliate fees. If a link is broken or a resource doesn't meet that bar, tell us.

Interactions & safety to check: Uterine Leiomyosarcoma

This is not a complete interaction check. It only covers the compounds we track and the signals reported in studies. A drug or supplement not listed here is not therefore safe. Bring your full medication and supplement list to your pharmacist and oncologist before changing anything.

Potential interactions: highest-stakes first

  • Nivolumab †RxΓ—immunosuppressantshigh-stakeshigh
    Avoid: Blunts efficacy (e.g., chronic steroids).
  • ResveratrolΓ—anticoagulantshigh-stakesmoderate
    Monitor: Potential platelet inhibition.
  • ResveratrolΓ—CYP3A4 substrateshigh-stakeslow
    Monitor: Induction may lower levels (e.g., statins).
  • Selenium (Stand-alone)Γ—platinum_chemohigh-stakeslow
    Monitor: Potential antagonism; time separately.
  • Nivolumab †RxΓ—Ipilimumabmoderate
    Synergize: Higher irAE but OS gains in melanoma.
  • Nivolumab †RxΓ—corticosteroidslow
    Use For IrAE: High-dose for toxicity; low-dose physiologic OK.
  • ResveratrolΓ—Doxorubicinlow
    Synergize: Apoptosis enhancement in breast.
  • Selenium (Stand-alone)Γ—antioxidantslow
    Synergize: Redox balance enhancement.
  • Selenium (Stand-alone)Γ—Cisplatinlow
    Synergize: Nephroprotection in lung cancer.

Safety considerations

Heading to an appointment? Get a printable one-page summary β€” studied compounds, open trials, interactions, and questions to ask.
Bring this to your appointment β†’